At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
all proofs start with the same thing, so a and b would be...?
given, i know that xD
ok, just making sure lol
ummm. now that i'm looking at it.....i'm not quite sure what to put....
i know angle 2 is congruent to angle 4 .....ugh lol it's so obvious stuff just don't what the answer would be
I still didn't understand how are we supposed to solve the question. Do you need to label it like 1-2-3 ?
you have to list the justifications for the statements in the boxes
c. by Definition of Supplementary Angles
or c. supplementary angles add up to 180
both wil work
d. by Definition of same-side interior angles
that's seriously all i have to put for d...?
but i don't see how you can state that they're same-side interior angles without proving that the lines are parallel
e. Converse of same-side interior angles theorem
yes, anything more than that would be irrelevent/redundant for d.