Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

ABC is a triangle where CD is the angle bisector . prove that geometric mean of AC and BC is greater than CD

Mathematics
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

To see the expert answer you'll need to create a free account at Brainly

|dw:1350477585294:dw|
Cosine Law maybe...?
i didnt give this question more than 10 mins,,thought i'd discuss here directly..so i dont know if that may work,, but i am thinking of some use of angle bisector theorem..

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

|dw:1350477770138:dw|
bc = a^2-b^2-c^2/Cos A greater than CD^2 (from GM > CD)
That's on whole triangle, could maybe get more from the 2 smaller triangles..
am so very sorry @estudier i had mistyped the question then,,please see now..
OK, so ab instead of bc, same thing though...
okay so we have c^2 = a^2 + b^2 - 2ab cosC => ab = a^2 + b^2 - c^2 / 2cos C
the next step ?
I haven't looked, I am just speculating (because of the ab term). Maybe you can apply the cosine law to the 2 smaller triangles and using the bisected angle
|dw:1350478392349:dw|
|dw:1350478324826:dw| x^2 = b^2 + m^2 -2bm cos@ c^2 + x^2 - 2cx = m^2 + a^2 - 2am cos@ =>c^2 - 2cx = a^2 -b^2 - 2mcos@ (a+b)
we are missing the ab term..hmm..
Doesn't matter, the ab term is in the first equation....
and we had c^2 = a^2 + b^2 - 2ab cos2@ how shall we combine ?
Well, the other half is m^2 so may as well isolate that ...
Then compare the 2 sides, see how to reduce them...
if we subtract , we have 2cx = 2b^2 - 2 ( ab cos2@ + m(a+b)cos@ )
why so ?
|dw:1350478727702:dw|
i'd second @sara12345
Someone lay me out ab > m^2 -> Using the expressions we have?
I was using my letters, now they are all different.....
@shubhamsrg Use your diagram, your letters......
|dw:1350479111593:dw|
AC cosy = BC cos(2x-y) = CD cos (x-y)
This gives:|dw:1350479343315:dw|
why AC cosy = BC cos(2x-y) = CD cos (x-y) ??
Express AC, BC and CD interms of CE
you interchanged AC and BC by mistake there it seems..please confirm..
|dw:1350505825096:dw|
\((bk)^2 = b^2+CD^2 - 2.b.CD \cos C/2\) \((ak)^2 = a^2+CD^2 - 2.a.CD \cos C/2\) combining above two : \(a[b^2(k^2-1) - CD^2] = b[a^2(k^2-1)-CD^2]\) \(CD^2(b-a) = ab(k^2-1)(a-b)\) \(CD^2 = ab(1-k^2)\) \(CD < \sqrt{ab}\)
1 Attachment
this proof looks more elegant, it didnt even depend on angle-bisector theorem !
Is it correct?
looks flawless to me :)
it does we cancelled sinx in the first line becoz the angles are same
Oh ya..... it does.
thanks a ton again @sauravshakya and @ganeshie8 earlier i couldnt find 1 method but now i have 2 ^_^
Welcome buddy.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question