Quantcast

A community for students. Sign up today!

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

sharon_penn

  • 2 years ago

State the missing reasons in this flow proof.

  • This Question is Closed
  1. sharon_penn
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    chart

    1 Attachment
  2. sharon_penn
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    a-e

  3. sharon_penn
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    any one on?

  4. sharon_penn
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ty

  5. aaronq
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    wait do you mean the statements? like angleABC because the reasons are already there

  6. sharon_penn
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    not sure thats why I'm confused

  7. aaronq
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I'm don't know what they're asking for :S sorry

  8. sharon_penn
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    k

  9. nincompoop
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    is this you the one needed help for?

  10. sharon_penn
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes

  11. sharon_penn
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    got it thanks

  12. nincompoop
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    A)∠5 is an acute angle (40º) B) ∠2 is an obtuse angle (140º) C) ∠2 + ∠5 = 180° forms a supplementary angle. therefore, forms a straight line D) If a transversal intersects two parallel lines, then the interior angles on the same side of the transversal are supplementary. E) If a transversal intersects two lines and the interior angles on the same side of the transversal are supplementary, then the lines are parallel.

  13. bahrom7893
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Not good at this, never learned it.

  14. nincompoop
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    this is a little confusing as I compose it, but I am sure it somewhat makes sense: ∠2 is congruent to ∠1 since ∠2 and ∠5 forms a straight line or a supplementary angles (180º) then ∠4 must be congruent to ∠1 and since ∠1 is congruent to ∠2 then ∠1 and ∠5 must also be supplementary angles, which proves that line a and b are parallel

  15. ganeshie8
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    a proof starts with whats 'Given' so we can simply put the reason 'Given' for a and b.

  16. ganeshie8
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    similarly we wil be good if we just put fill the blanks c,d, and e wid approproate reasons i guess

  17. nincompoop
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    rephrasing: A) given ∠5 in line b is an acute angle (40º) B) another given ∠2 in line a is an obtuse angle (140º) you are right about filling out the blanks, but I am not sure if the sentences D and E are even appropriate to state

  18. nincompoop
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    thanks for the guidance, @ganeshie8

  19. ganeshie8
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    :) c, your reason is good : 'supplementary angles add up to 180' d, we can simply fill wid : ' by Definition of same-side interior angles' e, we can fill wid : 'by Converse of same-side interior angles theorem'

  20. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    Search OpenStudy
    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Ask a Question
Find more explanations on OpenStudy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.