Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

UnkleRhaukus

  • 3 years ago

\[(\forall n\in \mathbb Z)[n|n^2]\]

  • This Question is Closed
  1. UnkleRhaukus
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    t/f

  2. ParthKohli
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    What does "|" mean in logic?

  3. joemath314159
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    divides

  4. ParthKohli
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    The division thing? Yes.

  5. ParthKohli
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    Except for 0.

  6. swissgirl
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    True

  7. ParthKohli
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    What if \(\rm n = 0\)?

  8. swissgirl
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    n^2=n*n so (n*n)/n=n

  9. ParthKohli
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    False.

  10. swissgirl
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Truesomeness

  11. ParthKohli
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    Though the statement is true for \(\mathbb{Z}^+\)

  12. joemath314159
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Dont read :\[n\mid n^2\]as division. By definition, \[a\mid b \iff b=ak ,k\in \mathbb{Z}\]there is no division taking place. By this definition, 0 does divide 0^2 since 0^2=0*0

  13. ParthKohli
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    I've always heard, zero cannot divide anything.

  14. joemath314159
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    You are thinking of fractions. Notice the definition doesnt contain anything about fractions.

  15. joemath314159
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    its a statement only about multiplication.

  16. ParthKohli
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    Oh.

  17. UnkleRhaukus
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    \[a|b \iff \exists q[b=aq],a\neq 0\]

  18. joemath314159
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    ah, then i am mistaken. if a cant be zero then what i posted is wrong.

  19. ParthKohli
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    So, in fact, we do have fractions in the definition.

  20. joemath314159
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    hmmm, i still wouldnt say there are fractions. This is generally the way they talk about division in Rings, where only multiplication and addition are defined. But yes, a cannot be zero. http://primes.utm.edu/glossary/xpage/divides.html

  21. UnkleRhaukus
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    \(a|b\) denotes \(b\) is divisible by \( a \)

  22. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy