A community for students. Sign up today!
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing

This Question is Closed

LilVeroDez13
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0You know that no matter how many examples you give to show that a conjecture is true, it does not prove the conjecture. It takes just one counterexample to disprove a conjecture. Describe a conjecture you thought was true based on many examples, but that turned out to be false based on a counterexample. The conjecture does not have to be mathematical.

tcarroll010
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Great question! The underlying principle is showing the difference between deductive and inductive reasoning. One interesting example would be to say what people do when someone yells "Fire" in a crowded theater. You might observe everyone panicking. And you might be in the same situation over and over and always see everyone panicking, and then conclude that everyone panics in that situation, until you see the first person who doesn't and that would shoot down your conjecture.

tcarroll010
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1That would be an example of deductive reasoning because you would be deducing (even though incorrectly) that everyone panics. You see lots of isolated examples and are then trying to come up with a general principle.
Ask your own question
Ask a QuestionFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.