Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

lgbasallote

  • 3 years ago

What is the converse of the implication "If |x| = x, then x >= 0"

  • This Question is Closed
  1. lgbasallote
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    it would be if x > =0 then |x| = x yes?

  2. Jonask
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    if \[\left| x \right|=x,then x <, 0\]

  3. lgbasallote
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    isn't that inverse?

  4. lgbasallote
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    wait..no...it isn't...

  5. lgbasallote
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i don't know what kind of statement that is...

  6. lgbasallote
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    if p then not q

  7. PhoenixFire
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    No, @lgbasallote is right. \[P \rightarrow Q\] converse is \[Q \rightarrow P\]

  8. lgbasallote
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    wonderful

  9. Jonask
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    excuse me ,sorry for the confusion

  10. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy