Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

Give the missing reasons in this proof of the Alternate Interior Angles Theorem. https://www.connexus.com/content/media/451160-12162010-102628-AM-439106449.png

Mathematics
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer

SIGN UP FOR FREE
if you cant view the picture (i think you cant) there is that :)
Well, for reason 3. It's definitely vertical angles are congruent but for reason 2. Can we like state a theorem? Or not? Because I wasn't allowed to do so in some proofs.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

yeah, anything is fine :)
Great :) So, I think reason 2. You can say that if two lines are parallel and they are cut by a tranversal then corresponding angles are congruent.
And also we can say in reason 4. the same thing but instead of corresponding we say alternate
thanks. i give you a vote :)
You're welcome! Haha, thanks :)

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question