Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

TheForbiddenFollower

  • 3 years ago

Give the missing reasons in this proof of the Alternate Interior Angles Theorem. https://www.connexus.com/content/media/451160-12162010-102628-AM-439106449.png

  • This Question is Closed
  1. TheForbiddenFollower
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

  2. TheForbiddenFollower
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    if you cant view the picture (i think you cant) there is that :)

  3. aroub
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    Well, for reason 3. It's definitely vertical angles are congruent but for reason 2. Can we like state a theorem? Or not? Because I wasn't allowed to do so in some proofs.

  4. TheForbiddenFollower
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yeah, anything is fine :)

  5. aroub
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    Great :) So, I think reason 2. You can say that if two lines are parallel and they are cut by a tranversal then corresponding angles are congruent.

  6. aroub
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    And also we can say in reason 4. the same thing but instead of corresponding we say alternate

  7. TheForbiddenFollower
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    thanks. i give you a vote :)

  8. aroub
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    You're welcome! Haha, thanks :)

  9. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy