Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

ParthKohli Group Title

The area of a square is just double its side. We have:\[\rm x^2 = 2x\]so\[x^2 - 2x = 0\]\[x(x - 2) = 0\]The solutions are 0 and 2, but is it possible to have a square with 0 as its side?

  • 2 years ago
  • 2 years ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. TuringTest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    not really. Some mathematicians have called such objects "degenerate" squares, but you can exclude those kinds of answers when they pertain to physical objects.

    • 2 years ago
  2. TuringTest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    I remember myin's "degenerate circle" question :)

    • 2 years ago
  3. myininaya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    That reminds me of a question I asked about circles. Can a "circle" with radius zero still be considered a circle? (x-h)^2+(y-k)^2=r^2 (x-h)^2+(y-k)^2=0 So in other words, can a single point on a graph be seen as a circle with radius 0.

    • 2 years ago
  4. myininaya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    lol. We were thinking the same thing.

    • 2 years ago
  5. TuringTest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Yes, I borrowed Zarkon's answer because I liked it :)

    • 2 years ago
  6. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Hmm...

    • 2 years ago
  7. satellite73 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    whom are you calling a degenerate?

    • 2 years ago
  8. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    If a point has 0 area, then the point doesn't cover any area... but a point still covers *some* area right?

    • 2 years ago
  9. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Like infinitesimal, but still, I don't agree with the point that a point has zero area. :p

    • 2 years ago
  10. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    It's not a fair point.

    • 2 years ago
  11. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yello.

    • 2 years ago
  12. jiteshmeghwal9 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i don't gt why \(x^2=2x\) @ParthKohli

    • 2 years ago
  13. UnkleRhaukus Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    a square has two dimensions

    • 2 years ago
  14. jiteshmeghwal9 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I have studied something like that \(x^2=x \times x\) \(2x=x+x\)

    • 2 years ago
  15. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @jiteshmeghwal9 See the top-line of my question.

    • 2 years ago
  16. TuringTest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    a point has no are as it is zero-dimensional, and squares (at least non-degenerate ones) require two dimensions as @UnkleRhaukus said

    • 2 years ago
  17. TuringTest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    no area*

    • 2 years ago
  18. jiteshmeghwal9 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Ohh ! im so stupid i gt it Okay :)

    • 2 years ago
  19. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    So 0 is not a solution for \(x\)?

    • 2 years ago
  20. TuringTest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    in the purely mathematical sense, I would say "yes it is a solution", but as a "square" in the normal sense of the word, or as a physical object, the answer would be "no".

    • 2 years ago
  21. UnkleRhaukus Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    if a side length is zero it is not a square

    • 2 years ago
  22. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Okay, I'm talking about this question. So, yes, 0 is not an answer to the word problem?

    • 2 years ago
  23. TuringTest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    @UnkleRhaukus @Zarkon termed such objects "degenerate". I think this is a sketchy question, they should have included the condition that \(x>0\) to avoid the subtleties in the philosophical mathematical implications of a zero-by-zero square.

    • 2 years ago
  24. UnkleRhaukus Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes zero is not an answer to word problem, however it does solve the equation

    • 2 years ago
  25. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Math is so idiotic.

    • 2 years ago
  26. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    lol. :)

    • 2 years ago
  27. UnkleRhaukus Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    maths is a tool,

    • 2 years ago
  28. TuringTest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    True.^ Professional mathematicians throw out useless concepts just because they are such. They also make their own theorems and definitions depending on what they feel is called for in a given situation. For example, many great mathematicians have \(defined\) \(0^0=1\) there is no objective mathematical proof of this, but sometimes it is convenient to do such things. These guys just make it up as they go along basically :P

    • 2 years ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.