Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

LeeTyler Group Title

what would be the pros and cons of using Linnean and modern classification system?

  • 2 years ago
  • 2 years ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. some_someone Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    One of the great advantages of Linnaeus’s classification system was that it was very easy to make changes or additions to it. Also I can tell you the many advantages. First it is in a common language that scientists use with each other, Latin, also this way scientist have one name for one organism, not many different names for one organism or the same name for many organisms. Each organism only has one scientific name from C. Linnaeus's system, and each name is only given to one organism. This way there will not be mistakes in translation about which organism is being spoken of. Linnaeus's naming system consists of two parts, the genus and the species. So not only does the identify the organism but it also identifies the group of close relatives it belongs in. He knew future discoveries would alter his system but that his basic outline would remain useful. A French biologist, Georges Cuvier, made the first changes to Linnaeus’s system around 1800. Cuvier created another level above Linnaeus’s classes called phyla. For example, Linnaeus recognized six different classes of animals, mammals, birds, reptiles, fish, insects, and worms. Cuvier grouped these into the phyla of vertebrates and invertebrates. A level of family was later added between genus and order. The 1800s also brought the study of fossils, remnants of living things from the past. Cuvier realized these creatures must be classified, too, and based their classification on a close study of their skeletal remains. This led to the entire system being based more on internal structures than outward appearances as Linnaeus had done. The system was complete, every living thing, alive or extinct, had a clear and specific identity.

    • 2 years ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.