Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

why is ln[log^0.9] undefined?

Mathematics
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

To see the expert answer you'll need to create a free account at Brainly

|dw:1351530480045:dw|
I don't think the question is typed clearly enough ln(log(30)^(0.9))=0.35108558... so that is defined.
@TuringTest where did you get log(30) from?

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

I'm just using an example log is not defined for x<=0, so unless that is the case for one of the arguments it is not a true statement.
logx not defined for x<=0 *
Right, my point is, is that the question does not taking the logarithm of anything: ln[(log( ))^0.9]
Oh, then I just didn't understand that you were saying that. I agree.
It is likely that the question was typed out wrong... who knows.
log^.9 means nothing, so it must be
exactly...

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question