Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

I saw this a little while ago and wanted to figure out how to prove that it's invalid. \[1+2+4+8+...+\infty= -1\] Proof is as follows: Knowing that \[1 * x=x\] and that \[2-1=1\] we can say that \[(2-1)(1+2+4+8+...+\infty)= -1\]expanding the brackets you get\[2+4+8+16+...+\infty- 1 - 2-4-8-...-\infty= -1\] everything from 2 up cancels leaving \[-1=-1\]

See more answers at
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly


Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

However, if you do it for anything up to but NOT including infinity it is wrong. \[(2-1)(1+2+4)=2+4+8-1-2-4=8-1=7\]Clearly not -1.
Something to do with Divergent Series. but I don't understand it. \[\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}2^n\] So I'm basically looking for a way to disprove the above claim for infinity.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

What do you get in the case of \[\infty - \infty=?\]Is there some law or rule that you can refer me to that explains that it's not equal to zero?
infinity is not a number so you cant always treat it like a number, some times you indeterminate forms
Well that makes sense now. I've always treated infinity as something unique and not a number, but when it came to this my brain got fried. Thanks, @UnkleRhaukus

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question