anonymous
  • anonymous
TOUGH GEOMETRY QUESTION http://puu.sh/1lMYq
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Whew, that's a beauty!
AccessDenied
  • AccessDenied
Hmm... it really is. :P I guess just to toss some ideas out there, but for the sphere to be placed inside that space, it would be tangent to: A) all three cones, and B) the plane containing the vertices of the three cones. Perhaps that could be useful somehow...
anonymous
  • anonymous
I think that (B) ^ you mention helps a lot.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

AccessDenied
  • AccessDenied
* And the distance to all four of those locations from the center are the same
anonymous
  • anonymous
I have a feeling similar triangle proportions could also be useful.
sirm3d
  • sirm3d
how about passing a plane containing the height of one cone and the center of the cylinder. on that plane is an isosceles triangle and a circle.
AccessDenied
  • AccessDenied
Hmm.. something like this? Although it is a sphere. I can see some angles we can find with trig here pretty easily also |dw:1351910642408:dw|
sirm3d
  • sirm3d
the projection of the center of the circle tn the plane containing the three centers of the bases is the centroid of the equilateral trianlge formed by the centers of the bases.
AccessDenied
  • AccessDenied
Hmm.. actually, I believe we could also determine the length of the segment from the vertex of this triangle to the sphere using that fact ^, and then use trigonometry with the angle to find the radius... |dw:1351911155230:dw|
AccessDenied
  • AccessDenied
|dw:1351911813104:dw| So if my Geometry skills aren't too rusty, 30-60-90 says that length from the center to the vertex is 100/sqrt(3) or 100sqrt(3)/3. The angle adjacent to the kite figure within the tangents is determined by right-angle trig: tan t = opp/adj: opp = 50, adj = 120 tan t = 50/120 = 5/12 t = arctan(5/12) So the complementary angle is 90 - arctan(5/12), or about 67.38. We break the angle in half for our right triangle because the diagonal bisects both angles. (90 - arctan(5/12))/2, or about 33.69. So we have a triangle with one angle known and one side known, so trigonometry will help us here. :) |dw:1351911929972:dw|
AccessDenied
  • AccessDenied
So if we just plug that into a calculator (I'm going to use wolfram): http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=100sqrt%283%29%2F3+*+tan%2833.69%29 It looks like we're at about 38.4899, which is pretty close to 38.5. :)
AccessDenied
  • AccessDenied
In summary: 1) Identify what tangents there are. (To the cones, to the plane containing the top of the cones) 2) Observe a planar section of the situation, namely the plane through the cone's vertical height and the circle's center. Problems are easier in 2D than 3D! 3) Use right angle trigonometry to find all of the information.
sirm3d
  • sirm3d
|dw:1351914302686:dw| i got 38.49002
AccessDenied
  • AccessDenied
Yep, looks correct! I wouldn't have thought about that method! :) If I hadn't rounded the arctan(5/12) and done the calculations at the end with those rounded numbers, I would have obtained 38.49002 as well (doing the calculations with my computer's calculator is being more cooperative than wolfram). :P

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.