A community for students. Sign up today!
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
 2 years ago
what is the difference between defining a quantity and expressing it, and how definition can be correlated with expression, also do they imply same meaning?
 2 years ago
what is the difference between defining a quantity and expressing it, and how definition can be correlated with expression, also do they imply same meaning?

This Question is Closed

henpen
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Look up the principle of impotence

ghazi
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.4i went through it and i am more nonplussed now

henpen
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Although I admit I don't quite understand the question. Isn't defining a nearsynonym for expression?

ghazi
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.4no, i guess defining something is bit more general then deriving it and expressing it mathematically like we saw in the definition of force

henpen
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So you worry that although force is intuitively obvious, there is no solid ground it safely rests on?

ghazi
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.4yes, if you are defining something then it must satisfy every thing logically and mathematically too

Carl_Pham
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1An expression is an instance of a definition. The best illustration is the computer programmming assigment statement: i = i + 1 As an expression, this is stupid. As a definition, it makes perfect sense: i is now defined to be the previous value of i, plus 1.

ghazi
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.4so when we talk about force, it is anything that we push or pull (in classical mechanics) but when we use newtons second law we say \[F=\frac{ \Delta P }{ \Delta T }\] when there is no change in momentum there is no force but there could be force if we take example of force applied on body when there is no motion. this is why i am highly confused

Carl_Pham
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Newton's Second Law is an equation of motion. It says how one measureable quantity (the momentum) changes, given some other measureable quantity (the force). From your point of view, it's an expression, not a definition.

ghazi
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.4when we talk about physics your example was a bit out of context though it is very obvious that if we won't define the variable we won't be able to run program, i just want to know in a general way, does mathematical expression always says or provides everything that is stated in the definition ?

Carl_Pham
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Of course not. There are many situations where I could write the expression F = 0. That says nothing about whether in general, for that system, force is zero. As I said, an expression is an instance of a definition (or more than one definition, combined).

ghazi
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.4thanks, this is what, was hitting me.
Ask your own question
Ask a QuestionFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.