At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
label a point on the surface of the sphere with the position vector\[\vec P=\langle a,b,c\rangle\]what is the gradient at that point?
@mathstina what is the gradient vector for any point on the sphere?
what is point ? is it (0,0,0)?
what do i sub for r value?
we aren't going top specify the point yet, because we want to prove the statement for the general case the function for the surface of the sphere is\[f(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2+z^2=r^2\]what is\[\nabla f\]?
2x i + 2y j + 2z k = r^2
r is a constant for a sphere, so this thingy should be =0
grad f=2x i + 2y j + 2z k = 0 still with me?
okay, now let the point be some x=a, y=b, and z=c that satisfies the function f and so is on the sphere what is the position vector at that point?
yes, and what is the gradient at that point ?
is it find the parametric eqn?
? no you just need the two vectors to solve this\[P(a,b,c)=\langle a,b,c\rangle\]\[\nabla f(a,b,c)=?\]
a picture may help us visualize what we're doing|dw:1352129016463:dw|
2a i+2b j+2c k =0
yes, but be consistent in your notation. Write *all* vectors, including the position vector, the same way now compare the position vector and the gradient vector. What do you see?
multiplied by 2
yes, so what does that say bout the relationship between the two vectors?
sry, im nt sure
the scalar multiple of any vector points in the *same direction* as the original the gradient vector is a scalar multiple of the position vector, hence what can we say about their relative orientations?
both pointing in the same dirn; parallel
yes, now look at what this means visually...
the points are on the level surface
|dw:1352129723349:dw|since the position vector and grad f are parallel for any point on the sphere, they are collinear. Since gradf is normal to the sphere, so must be the line hence, we can draw a line that contains both. Since the position vector passes through the origin, we know that any such line will also pass through the origin. Hence all normal lines to the surface. Make sense?
hence all normal lines to the surface pass through the origin*
good, then we're done :)
ihw do i answer the qn? mathematically written
let P be a point on the sphere\[\vec P=\langle a,b,c\rangle\]then\[\nabla f=2\vec P\implies \nabla f\parallel\vec P\]hence they are collinear. since the line containing P passes through the origin, and any line that contains P must also contain grad f, this means that so does any line normal to the sphere passes though the origin. QED I don't think any more math symbols are necessary, sometimes words are important in proofs.