Hello! I just finished the very first problem on problem set 1 thanks to you guys. What do you think of the code I wrote? I am a starter. I would like to know if I am on the right direction or developing some bad habit. Any advice would be greatly appreciated candidates=range(3,10000,2) prime=() i=0 while (i<4999): x = 2 dec=0 while (x0: i=i+1 else: prime=prime+(candidates[i],) i=i+1 print prime[998] and I got the right answer which is 7919. Thanks in advance!

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions.

A community for students.

Hello! I just finished the very first problem on problem set 1 thanks to you guys. What do you think of the code I wrote? I am a starter. I would like to know if I am on the right direction or developing some bad habit. Any advice would be greatly appreciated candidates=range(3,10000,2) prime=() i=0 while (i<4999): x = 2 dec=0 while (x0: i=i+1 else: prime=prime+(candidates[i],) i=i+1 print prime[998] and I got the right answer which is 7919. Thanks in advance!

Computer Science
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

hey - it's nice.... you can speed and clean it a little: candidates = range(3, 10000, 2) prime = [] # i have no real reason to choose a list -[]-over a tuple-(), maybe faster i = 0 while i < 4999: ....x = 2 ....dec = 0 ....while x <= candidates[i] // 2: # can't be > candidates[i]/2 ........if candidates[i] % x == 0: ............dec = dec + 1 ........x = x + 1 # this is done in any case.... ....if dec == 0: # saves an else ........prime.append(candidates[i]) # this is where list maybe faster- []- instead of () ....i = i + 1 # could write i += 1, same thing.but is always done here print (prime[998]) of course, your code is good - it works! There's not even a whole nit to pick on... ( how do you get indents to work here? )
One thing that you'll regret in a month or two is that some of your variable names aren't too descriptive, and there aren't any comments. FWIW, I've been writing my comments first to frame out my functions.
Thank you guys! I really appreciate your advice! To snark, I just copied and pasted the code directed from python. It should work for you !

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question