Find the points on \(x^2+xy+y^2=3\) which are closest and farthest from \((0,0)\)

- richyw

Find the points on \(x^2+xy+y^2=3\) which are closest and farthest from \((0,0)\)

- Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com

Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

- katieb

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

- AccessDenied

Hmm... What sort of class are you doing this problem for?

- richyw

refresher course in calculus.

- richyw

this is a multivariable optimization problem.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

- AccessDenied

Ah. I had a feeling it was calc. ;P I was thinking of maybe using rotation of axes and trying to use conic section properties. I'm not as familiar with the multivar calc methods I saw before.

- richyw

Would you be able to do it without calc? Any method that get's the answer is fine by me haha.

- AccessDenied

It's been a while since I did rotation of axes, but what it basically does is removes the obnoxious 'xy' term by using more obnoxious trig. With any luck though, we could possibly get a nice conic section like an ellipse, where we can identify the major and minor axes for those maximum/minimum distances

- AccessDenied

This PDF has some pretty sweet pictures and explanation, I thought it was really helpful: http://www.stewartcalculus.com/data/CALCULUS%20Early%20Vectors/upfiles/RotationofAxes.pdf

- cruffo

I have a suggestion that may not require much more than calc 1...

- cruffo

We want to maximize and minimize the distance between the curve and the point. \[\large \text{Distance}^2 = (x-0)^2 + (y-0)^2 = x^2 + y^2\] problem is that the curve is not easily solved for y. But If you use quadratic formula and solve for y thus, \[\large y^2 +xy + (x^2 -3) = 0\] you may have some luck..

- richyw

hmm. that could work. but will keep bumping for a calc answer! Thanks for all your help though.

- AccessDenied

Alright, I got my method to work out, although it is quite long and tedious. lol ------------------------------------------------------------- w = r cos t z = r sin t x = r cos(t + p) y = r sin(t + p) x = r cos t cos p - r sin t sin p y = r sin t cos p + r cos t sin p x = w cos p - z sin p y = z cos p + w sin p (w cos p - z sin p)^2 + (w cos p - z sin p)(z cos p + w sin p) + (z cos p + w sin p)^2 = 3 w^2 cos^2 p - 2 wz sin p cos p + z^2 sin^2 p + wz cos^2 p + w^2 sin p cos p - z^2 sin p cos p - wz sin^2 p + z^2 cos^2 p + 2 wz cos p sin p + w^2 sin^2 p = 3 w^2 (cos^2 p + sin p cos p + sin^2 p) + wz(-2sin p cos p + cos^2 p - sin^2 p + 2sin p cos p) + z^2 (sin^2 p - sin p cos p + cos^2 p) = 3 w^2 (1 + sin p cos p) + wz(cos^2 p - sin^2 p) + z^2(1 - sin p cos p) = 3 w^2 (1 + sin p cos p) + wz cos(2p) + z^2 (1 - sin p cos p) = 3 w^2 (1 + 1/2 sin(2p)) + wz cos(2p) + z^2 (1 - 1/2 sin(2p)) = 3 cos(2p) = 0 2p = pi/2 p = pi/4 w^2 (1 + 1/2 sin 2(pi/4)) + wz cos(2 pi/4) + z^2 (1 - 1/2 sin(2 pi/4)) = 3 w^2 (1 + 1/2) + 0wz + z^2(1 - 1/2) = 3 3/2 w^2 + 1/2 z^2 = 3 1/2 w^2 + 1/6 z^2 = 1 Our rotation of axes doesn't affect (0, 0)'s position, so we can ignore messing with it. sqrt(2) is 1/2 the length of our minor axis, and it is along the x-axis. (+- sqrt(2), 0) are our minor vertices. sqrt(6) is 1/2 the length of our major axis, and it is along the y-axis. (0, +- sqrt(6) are our major vertices. So, the last thing to do now is convert back to the original system. (w, z) = (sqrt(2), 0) x = sqrt(2) cos(pi/4) - 0 sin(pi/4) y = 0 cos(pi/4) + sqrt(2) sin (pi/4) x = sqrt(2)* sqrt(2)/2 = 1 y = sqrt(2) sqrt(2)/2 = 1 (1, 1) is the minimum point, along with (-1, -1). (w, z) = (0, sqrt(6)) x = 0 cos(pi/4) - sqrt(6) sin(pi/4) y = sqrt(6) cos(pi/4) + 0 sin(pi/4) x = -sqrt(6) * sqrt(2)/2 = -sqrt(3) y = sqrt(6) * sqrt(2)/2 = sqrt(3) (-sqrt(3), sqrt(3)), and (sqrt(3), -sqrt(3)) Conclusion: Points closest to (0, 0): (1, 1) and (-1, -1). Points farthest from (0, 0): (-sqrt(3), sqrt(3)) and (sqrt(3), -sqrt(3)). --------------------------------------------

- cruffo

Got the same thing using the same method :)

- richyw

holy! thanks for putting in that effort. I really appreciate it.

- AccessDenied

I looked into a method of solving this using Lagrange Multipliers. I'm no expert with this multivariable calc, but here's my attempt: Let \(D = d^2 = x^2 + y^2\) be the equation we are trying to optimize, and our constraint is \(x^2 + xy + y^2 = 3\). In general, this Lagrange Multiplier stuff says that: \(\nabla f(x,y) = \lambda \nabla g(x,y) \) We can then break this up into individual partial derivatives in each variable. \( f_x(x,y) = \lambda g_x(x,y) \), and \( f_y(x,y) = \lambda g_y(x,y) \). Pairing this up with our constraint, we have a three-variable system of equations: \( f_x(x,y) = \lambda g_x(x,y) \), \( f_y(x,y) = \lambda g_y(x,y) \), \( g(x,y) = k \) Now, we'll go back to our problem and we'll apply this information. \(f(x,y) = D\), \(g(x,y) = x^2 + xy + y^2\), and \(k = 3\). \(D_x = \lambda g_x\), \(D_y = \lambda g_y\) \(g = k\) \(2x = \lambda \left(2x + y\right)\) \(2y = \lambda \left(2y + x\right) \) \( x^2 + xy + y^2 = 3 \) From what I can see, solving this system gives you the answers. I suppose there are some checks that should be carried out to verify that your answers are correct from there. http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+system+%7B2x%3Dz%282x%2By%29%2C+2y%3Dz%282y%2Bx%29%2C+x%5E2%2Bxy%2By%5E2%3D3%7D

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.