• anonymous
The owner of a large company is conducting a survey about job satisfaction, including questions about salary, hours, stress, and other conditions. There are about eight hundred employees in the company, including one hundred executive positions, six hundred fifty middle-management positions, and fifty custodial positions. The owner wants to include about ten percent of his employees in the survey sample. Identify a sampling method that might produce a biased sample. Explain why using the method for this survey would be a poor choice.
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at in under 10 minutes. Go to now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly


Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

  • blues
The sample should be drawn proportionally from all levels of the staff. It would be no good to sample a disproportionally large number of executives, for example - they might be happier with their jobs than the others (higher salaries, better benefits) or they might be less happy with their jobs than the others (stuck behind a desk all day, unhappy with corporate environment, etc). The same arguments against disproportional sampling could be applied to any of the other groups. For one example.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.