anonymous
  • anonymous
Fermi Problem: How many paper clips in a jar with the following ? The Jar: 6.5 litre capacity Length and width of 1 paper clip: 2 x 0.5 inches
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
radar
  • radar
Since there is no dimension given for the paper clip thickness, there could be a whole lot, an infinite amount.
anonymous
  • anonymous
^ has a point there.
radar
  • radar
convert the 6.5 liter to cubic centimeters. convert the dimensions of the paper clips (when you have all 3) length, width, and depth) to centimeters. Convert to cubic centimeters and divide into the cubic centimeters of the jar. That would be one method, but in this case, I would borrow a whole bunch of paper clips and fill the jar, then count them.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

radar
  • radar
I don't know how to calculate the space used up by a paperclip. Maybe find its displacement in water...????
anonymous
  • anonymous
I know the Fermi Problem method is to make an 'order of magnitude estimate.' 6500cc's by (I'd estimate 1.25cc's per paper clip) I'd get around 5000, but given the margins of error (which are large), I'd put the orders of magnitude between 1,000 and 10,000
anonymous
  • anonymous
@radar, I don't think the exact volume of the paperclip would help since their negative space contributes as well (stacking problem). There is also the issue of unperfect (random) stacking from the assumed 'just-pour-a-bunch-of-paperclips-in-there' method of filling the container.
radar
  • radar
Oh, I was completely off base, as I wasn't even considering Fermi, is this the same Fermi that did work in quantum mechanics and in semiconductors?
anonymous
  • anonymous
^ Yeah, Richard Feynman talked about him a lot and spoke of this method.
radar
  • radar
Yes I agree, the geography of a paper clip would preclude an orderly calculation.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I think he used 'back-of-the-envelope estimate' as a descriptor as well.
radar
  • radar
Thanks, I learn a lot from this Open Study.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Me too!
radar
  • radar
Nice chatting with you CliffSedge.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Same, Mr. radar. What do you think, @burhan101 ?
anonymous
  • anonymous
this is a really complex question, i have like a white board with stuff on it haha :$ still in the process of finding a reasonable way to approach this
anonymous
  • anonymous
The reasonable approach is to guess and not be too outlandish about it.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.