A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
josephT
 3 years ago
This question refers to lecture 6 of the Single Variable Calculus course, where Dr. Jerison is showing how to calculate d/dx a^x.
(1801scsinglevariablecalculusfall2010
Session 17: The Exponential Function, its Derivative, and its Inverse)
Isn't there an error at 18:12 of the lecture?
The equation d/dx f(kx) = k f'(kx) mixes Newton's and Leibnitz's notation, but, using Newton's, the equation is f'(kx) = k f'(kx).
It seems this could only be correct for k=1 (or f'(kx) = 0).
But k is "any number", not just 1; and f'(kx) = 2^(kx) ln(kx), so f'(kx) could only be 0 if kx = 1.
Well, that rules out k being "any number  it has to be the reciprocal of x  and it couldn't be 0.
Any help explaining this apparent difficulty with the proof would be appreciated.
Thanks.
josephT
 3 years ago
This question refers to lecture 6 of the Single Variable Calculus course, where Dr. Jerison is showing how to calculate d/dx a^x. (1801scsinglevariablecalculusfall2010 Session 17: The Exponential Function, its Derivative, and its Inverse) Isn't there an error at 18:12 of the lecture? The equation d/dx f(kx) = k f'(kx) mixes Newton's and Leibnitz's notation, but, using Newton's, the equation is f'(kx) = k f'(kx). It seems this could only be correct for k=1 (or f'(kx) = 0). But k is "any number", not just 1; and f'(kx) = 2^(kx) ln(kx), so f'(kx) could only be 0 if kx = 1. Well, that rules out k being "any number  it has to be the reciprocal of x  and it couldn't be 0. Any help explaining this apparent difficulty with the proof would be appreciated. Thanks.

This Question is Closed

nmonson
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0d/dx f(kx) is not equivalent to f'(kx), but rather (f(kx))'. In this case f(kx) is a composition of functions where f( ) is the outer function and kx is the inner function. Apply the chain rule. Multiply the derivative of the outer function  f'(kx)  by the derivative of the inner function  k. So d/dx f(kx) = kf'(kx). Or (f(kx))' = kf'(kx).

josephT
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I think I understand what you mean: When Dr Jerison writes f'(kx), that means the deriv with respect to kx of f(kx). [Would that be d/d(kx) f(kx) in Leibnitz notation?] And if u = kx, then, by the chain rule, d/dx f(u) = d/du f(u) * du/dx d/dx f(u) = d/du f(u) * d/dx kx d/dx f(u) = d/du f(u) * k which, replacing the rest of the u's with kx's gives: d/dx f(kx) = d/d(kx) f(kx) * k or as Dr Jerison correctly wrote: d/dx f(kx) = k * f'(kx) Please tell me if I got anything wrong here. And thanks so much for your taking the time to answer.

nmonson
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Looks good to me. Don't know enough about notation to say if it's conventional to write d/d(kx). Conceptually though, you seem to have it as far as I can tell.
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.