Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

UnkleRhaukus Group Title

Is there a simpler method to show from the definition of the Laplace transform. \[\mathcal L\left\{t\sin(nt)\right\}=\frac{2pn}{\left(p^2+n^2\right)^2}\]

  • 2 years ago
  • 2 years ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. LolWolf Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I haven't come across a nicer one, myself, but it'd be nice to see.

    • 2 years ago
  2. LolWolf Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    (If what I'm seeing is right, of course, considering it's cut off)

    • 2 years ago
  3. LolWolf Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    http://mathurl.com/aq279pu.png

    • 2 years ago
  4. hartnn Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    so u can't use properties of LT ?

    • 2 years ago
  5. UnkleRhaukus Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    \[\mathcal L\left\{t\sin(nt)\right\}=\int\limits_0^\infty t\sin(nt)e^{-pt}\text dt\] \[=\int_0^\infty t\frac{e^{int}-e^{-int}}{2i}e^{-pt}\text dt\] \[=\frac 1{2i}\int_0^\infty t({e^{int}-e^{-int}})e^{-pt}\text dt\] \[=\frac 1{2i}\left(\int_0^\infty t\cdot e^{-(p-in)t}\text dt-\int_0^\infty t\cdot e^{-(p+in)t}\text dt\right)\] \[=\frac 1{2i}\left[\left(\left.\frac{t\cdot e^{-(p-in)}}{-(p-in)}\right|_0^\infty-\int_0^\infty\frac{e^{-(p-in)t}}{-(p-in)}\text dt\right)\right.\]\[\qquad\left.-\left(\left.\frac{t\cdot e^{-(p+in)}}{-(p+in)}\right|_0^\infty-\int_0^\infty\frac{e^{-(p+in)t}}{-(p+in)}\text dt\right)\right]\] \[=\frac 1{2i}\left[\left(0+\int_0^\infty\frac{e^{-(p-in)t}}{(p-in)}\text dt\right)-\left(0+\int_0^\infty\frac{e^{-(p+in)t}}{(p+in)}\text dt\right)\right]\] \[=\frac 1{2i}\left[\int_0^\infty\frac{e^{-(p-in)t}}{(p-in)}\text dt-\int_0^\infty\frac{e^{-(p+in)t}}{(p+in)}\text dt\right]\] \[=\frac 1{2i}\left[\left.\frac{e^{-(p-in)t}}{-(p-in)^2}-\frac{e^{-(p+in)t}}{-(p+in)^2}\right|_0^\infty\right]\] \[=\frac 1{2i}\left[\frac{1}{(p-in)^2}-\frac{1}{(p+in)^2}\right]\] \[=\frac 1{2i}\left[\frac{(p+in)^2-(p+in)^2}{(p-in)^2(p-in)^2}\right]\] \[=\frac 1{2i}\left[\frac{(p^2-2ipn-n^2)-(p^2+2ipn-n^2)}{\left((p-in)(p+in)\right)^2}\right]\] \[=\frac 1{2i}\left[\frac{-4ipn}{\left(p^2+n^2\right)^2}\right]\] \[=\frac{2pn}{\left(p^2+n^2\right)^2}\]

    • 2 years ago
  6. UnkleRhaukus Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    the question was "From the definition, evaluate the following Laplace transforms."

    • 2 years ago
  7. mahmit2012 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    0 L(sinnt)=n/p2+n2 L(tsinnt)=-d/dp(n/p2+n2)=2np/(p2_n2)2

    • 2 years ago
  8. LolWolf Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    From definition...?

    • 2 years ago
  9. UnkleRhaukus Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    \[\mathcal {L}\{ t f(t)\}=-\frac{\text d}{\text dp}F(p)\] @mahmit2012 does that follow from the definition?

    • 2 years ago
  10. LolWolf Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I guess you could write it as a Lemma... don't know how that will fly, with your prof. though.

    • 2 years ago
  11. mahmit2012 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yes, that is correct.

    • 2 years ago
  12. LolWolf Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I'm still thinking it requires some work, it doesn't just follow from definition.

    • 2 years ago
  13. UnkleRhaukus Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    \[\mathcal L\left\{t sin(nt) \right\}\] \[\qquad\qquad\text{let } f(t)=sin(nt)\]\[\qquad\qquad F(t)= \frac{n}{p^2+n^2}\]\[\qquad\qquad \mathcal {L}\{ t f(t)\}=-\frac{\text d}{\text dp}F(p)\]\[\mathcal L\left\{tf(p)\right\}=-\frac{\text d}{\text dp}\left(\frac{n}{p^2+n^2}\right)\]\[=-\frac{\text d}{\text dp}\left({n}({p^2+n^2})^{-1}\right)\]\[=-2pn(p^2+n^2)^{-2}\]\[=\frac{2pn}{(p^2+n^2)^2}\]

    • 2 years ago
  14. UnkleRhaukus Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    that is much quicker

    • 2 years ago
  15. hartnn Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    but u didn't use definition.....

    • 2 years ago
  16. LolWolf Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I agree, but I thought you said it had to be from definition...?

    • 2 years ago
  17. hartnn Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    u used a property that follows from definition

    • 2 years ago
  18. UnkleRhaukus Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i did prove \[f(t)=sin(nt)\] \[F(p)= \frac{n}{p^2+n^2}\] in a earlier question

    • 2 years ago
  19. hartnn Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    with the given question, i would go with your earlier response, though its longer

    • 2 years ago
  20. LolWolf Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    What I was trying to say, as with @hartnn is, just go ahead and prove this: \[\mathcal {L}\{ t f(t)\}=-\frac{d}{dp}F(p)\] as a lemma, and you know that you're working from definition.

    • 2 years ago
  21. UnkleRhaukus Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i havent proved \[\mathcal {L}\{ t f(t)\}=-\frac{\text d}{\text dp}F(p)\] yet

    • 2 years ago
  22. LolWolf Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yes, and you should as it's not a corollary of the definition, it's actually a lemma. Once you've got that, just reference it, I haven't had professors nag me about doing such like this, yet, but you never know.

    • 2 years ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.