I am supposed to integrate Kepler´s second Law to find T (period) as a function of R (radius of a circle). However, this is a special case where we talk about a circle and not about an ellipse. See the attachment for details.

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions.

A community for students.

I am supposed to integrate Kepler´s second Law to find T (period) as a function of R (radius of a circle). However, this is a special case where we talk about a circle and not about an ellipse. See the attachment for details.

Physics
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

1 Attachment
Here is what I did so far.
1 Attachment
But I have to no good reason to drop the sin when I integrate. However I think the end is correct. But I can not justify my steps to get there.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

What did you get when you integrated?
The thing you see on the sol.jepg picture. On the left side it will be A(T) which is a full circle because we are talking about a circular orbit so when the Period T passes the planet is where it was before and has therefore made a full circle area which is pi*r^2. On the right side I am kind of clueless how to integrate that stuff properly.
Alright, if we use the equation you're using: \[dA=\frac{1}{2}r v \sin(\alpha)dt\]Which of those quantities changes in time?
A and the angle alpha. r is constant because we talk about a circular orbit, and therefore the velocity is also constant (or the speed).
Now, I want you to be cautious. In this example, you know that the angle changes linearly in time, but you know exactly how it changes?
I'm curious how you derived your differential equation. Is that the equation that is given to you for Kepler's second law?
Yes, if you look at Kepler´s law and say that dt is very small than you can say that the area made by the radius is a triangle.
here is a picture of it
1 Attachment
However, I am still clueless how the angle depends on time. Is it the integral of omega (the angular velocity)?
I'm not sure. Alpha is going to be a function of r(t) and r(t+dt).
alpha=omega*t
That one should be helpfull...
than I could rewrite 0.5*v*r*sin(alpha) as 0.5*omega*sin(omega*t) but the integral of that after dt is only -0.5*cos(omega*t)
Alpha, as an angle, should be the radial angle if it's omega*t. |dw:1352577895185:dw|
Because the angular velocity is defined as: \[\omega =\frac{d \theta}{dt} \rightarrow \omega\ dt = d \theta\]
but that gives me:
1 Attachment
I would do it this way. Since this is a circle, you can define the area of any arc as: \[A=\frac{1}{2}\theta r^2\]If we look at a small piece of A, then it becomes:\[dA=\frac{1}{2}r^2d\theta\]\[dA=\frac{1}{2}r^2\omega dt\]
but I want to find T as a function of r. How does this help?
\[\int\limits_{A(0)}^{A(T)}dA=\int\limits_{0}^{T}\frac{1}{2}r\omega\ dt\]\[A(T)=\frac{1}{2}r\omega T\]\[\pi r^2=\frac{1}{2}r\omega T\]
Sorry, sorry. I missed an r term. One second.
like that?
1 Attachment
Yep. Looks okay to me.
It seems that we only used mathematics but not Kepler´s second law.
Well, Kepler's second law just states that the area swept out by the radius vector sweeps out equal areas in equal time intervals.
... ah so we used that to claim that omega is constant!
Usually, the more general form of Kepler's law that I use most is: \[dA=\frac{1}{2}|\vec r \times d\vec r|\]No, not exactly. We could only claim that because it's a circle.
But than we did not use any stuff of kepler. The formula for A follows from the unit circle and the rest was mathematics.
It's not that. It's that we made a simplification based on our understanding of the problem.
Where did we simplify?

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question