At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I guess I have to set something zero for a) and perhaps in b) z should be constant?
use dot product. If need more help tell. :)
I do the dot thing to get the parellel part and a cross product for the perpendicular part?
yes. to find where it is perpendicular to z axis solve this equation: nabla f . (0,0,1)=0 for paralel : nabla f . (0,0,1)= |nabla f|
other way would be finding maximum and minimum of |nabla f|
So for the parallel part I dont use a any vector but the vector (0,0,1) and dot this vector with nabla?
for a) I ended up with z^2=xy Is that my final answert for a set of points for which the gradient is parallel to the z-axis?
for b) I got now y^2-xz=x^2-yz This looks also not very good as a final answer.
for b): 3(x^2-yz,y^2-xz,z^2-xy).(0,0,1)=3sqrt((x^2-yz)^2+(y^2-xz)^2+(z^2-xy)^2)=> (z^2-xy)=sqrt((x^2-yz)^2+(y^2-xz)^2+(z^2-xy)^2) now should try to simplify this somehow
noticing that it will happen when : (x^2-yz)^2=0 and (y^2-xz)^2=0
so x^2=yz and y^2=xz from 1º: y=x^2/z putting this in 2º: x^4/z^2=xz => x^3=z^3 =>x=z=y which is a line passing through the origin forming 45º with every axis
So x, y, and z can be any number but as long as the have all the same value the gradient of phi is parallel to the z-axis?
:( c) When is the gradient zero. There I already calculated that the gradient would be zero for x=y=z so it seems kind of weird that this is the same solution for the gradient to be parallel to the z-axis.
But you calculated x=y=z so how can x=y=0 and z= anything?
Ya that's true. Forget it.
On the other hand as much as I remmeber vector that is 0 is also considered perpendicular or parallel to anything
This is confusing. Did I at least got a) right? I ended up with z^2=xy but that looks kind of weird for a final answert, but I don´t know if I can simplify or clarify that anymore.
Yes it's right. Here you got the graph of that: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=z%5E2%3Dxy+
I think part b) is ok too. Not sure tough, how to explain that it is same as for c)
Hmmmm ... I am still pretty confused but if you think this is alright than I will stick to it. Thank you for your help, especially since this took so long. Thanks a lot, myko.
Glad to help. Sry for not clarifying it till the end...