Quantcast

A community for students. Sign up today!

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

Screech

  • 2 years ago

Am I alone in thinking that the arguments to the range() function are quirky. range(m,n) - m is start, n is end-1 range(m,n,i) - m is start, n is end-1 and i is increment ok that looks pretty easy to remember. 2nd argument is end-1 and optional 3rd is increment. but then range(n) - end-1 What? The 2nd arg is optional and has taken the place of 1st where a default 0 is applied. Would it have made more sense to allow range(,n) or else range(0,n) to be consistent across all args?

  • This Question is Closed
  1. asnaseer
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    hmmm - maybe. I think they chose this interface to make the "common" usage simple - i.e. range(n)

  2. asnaseer
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    otherwise the common case would involve writing slightly more code - range(0, n)

  3. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Ask a Question
Find more explanations on OpenStudy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.