anonymous
  • anonymous
Am I alone in thinking that the arguments to the range() function are quirky. range(m,n) - m is start, n is end-1 range(m,n,i) - m is start, n is end-1 and i is increment ok that looks pretty easy to remember. 2nd argument is end-1 and optional 3rd is increment. but then range(n) - end-1 What? The 2nd arg is optional and has taken the place of 1st where a default 0 is applied. Would it have made more sense to allow range(,n) or else range(0,n) to be consistent across all args?
MIT 6.189 A Gentle Introduction to Programming Using Python (OCW)
katieb
  • katieb
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

asnaseer
  • asnaseer
hmmm - maybe. I think they chose this interface to make the "common" usage simple - i.e. range(n)
asnaseer
  • asnaseer
otherwise the common case would involve writing slightly more code - range(0, n)

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.