Here's the question you clicked on:
KatieMO
Ok, I need to understand HOW to do this. My teacher confuses the living day lights out of me... and I need help!
I know that 1 is given and 3 is reflexive property.
1. Given 2. ? 3. By reflexive property of equality 4. Given 5. ? 6. ?
Would 6 be- By ASA Property?
1. Given 2. By definition of Angle bisector 3. By reflexive property of equality 4. Given 5. By definition of Angle bisector 6. ?
6. ASA congruency postulate = \(\checkmark\)
Thank you SOOOO MUCH!!! On number 5, you got that because 4 was given and the triangle was cut in half right?
4 was given that OM is angle bisector. 5 we got becoz, an angle bisector cuts the ANLGE in half
an angle bisector cuts the angle into two equal halves. so, <POM = <NOM
what i ment! lol thank u!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:) yw... ik.... just to be specific i explicitly mentioned ;p good work !
lol THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!1