## KatieMO 3 years ago Ok, I need to understand HOW to do this. My teacher confuses the living day lights out of me... and I need help!

1. KatieMO

2. KatieMO

I know that 1 is given and 3 is reflexive property.

3. ganeshie8

1. Given 2. ? 3. By reflexive property of equality 4. Given 5. ? 6. ?

4. KatieMO

Would 6 be- By ASA Property?

5. ganeshie8

1. Given 2. By definition of Angle bisector 3. By reflexive property of equality 4. Given 5. By definition of Angle bisector 6. ?

6. ganeshie8

6. ASA congruency postulate = \(\checkmark\)

7. KatieMO

Thank you SOOOO MUCH!!! On number 5, you got that because 4 was given and the triangle was cut in half right?

8. ganeshie8

4 was given that OM is angle bisector. 5 we got becoz, an angle bisector cuts the ANLGE in half

9. ganeshie8

an angle bisector cuts the angle into two equal halves. so, <POM = <NOM

10. KatieMO

what i ment! lol thank u!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

11. ganeshie8

:) yw... ik.... just to be specific i explicitly mentioned ;p good work !

12. KatieMO

lol THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!1