Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.
so as the number of 'people' \(x\) increases, the amount of common sense \(y\) approaches \(0\)
concluding that there will always be common sense but it decreases steadily to a very minute amount, yet never reaching extinction :)
but then i can't have a slant asymptote right ? @yummydum
well that was just logic....if you solve the equation you mentioned you get a slant asymptote of \(y=x\) ... i would say to consider the original problem again because LOGICALLY speaking there is not a \(positive\) asymptote because that would mean that humans are have increasing common sense which evidently is absolutely NOT the case (just take a look around lol) ...hope im being helpful here :)