Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

Another differential equation \[\frac{ dy }{ dt }=0.4(y-300)\] and y(0)=75. So, I separate the variables into dy/(y-300 = .4dt integrate both side for ln(y-300)=.4t+c exponentiate then add 300 to the right for y=300+e^(.4t+c).

Mathematics
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

Now I think I should use my initial value, so 75=300+e^c => -225=e^c => 225=-e^c , and take logs of both sides to get ln(225)=-c
Next I should plug -ln(225) for c in the equation ln(y-300)=.4t+c, giving me ln(y-300)=.4t-ln(225) right? Or and I doing something wrong?
I added the log from the right to the left, and using property of logs combined them to a quotient, but the answer after simplification was wrong, so I must be missing something.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

225=-e^c , and take logs of both sides to get ln(225)=-c <----NO
if 225 = e^(-c) then -c = ln 225
y=300+e^(.4t+c). y=300+e^(.4t)e^c. y=300-225e^(.4t)
i put e^c = -225
ah i see
any more doubts ? all clear ?
I think so, I am not so quick, I will work it out!
Ah, there really isn't any working out to do because e^c is a constant and its all in terms of y. So simple, thanks again.
welcome :)

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question