Got Homework?
Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
So we know that the pattern goes that i^3=i and i^7 is also i. So if you set them equal to each other, i^3=i^7 and then take the log to both sides you get:
3ln(i)=7ln(i)
And then you can simplify this down by dividing out the ln(i) to get 3=7. Obviously this isn't true, so what am I doing wrong?
 one year ago
 one year ago
So we know that the pattern goes that i^3=i and i^7 is also i. So if you set them equal to each other, i^3=i^7 and then take the log to both sides you get: 3ln(i)=7ln(i) And then you can simplify this down by dividing out the ln(i) to get 3=7. Obviously this isn't true, so what am I doing wrong?
 one year ago
 one year ago

This Question is Closed

ktnguyen1Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
dw:1352847101536:dw
 one year ago

KainuiBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
Give me as deep an answer as possible, I've taken linear algebra and differential equations and I'm planning on taking real analysis soon and want to understand all this stuff perfectly. I know how to take the natural log of i, and it is defined as an imaginary number, so I don't think that explains it well enough for me.
 one year ago

KainuiBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=ln(i)&t=crmtb01
 one year ago

TuringTestBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
it looks like logs of imaginary numbers don't have those rules... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_logarithm
 one year ago

asnaseerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
ln(i) is actually a multivalued function  so cannot just cancel out ln(i) from both sides of your identity since the identity would only be valid for DIFFERENT values of ln(i) on the left and right hand sides of that identity. You could form a similar case with real numbers  if x=1, then:\[x^3=x^7\]therefore:\[3\ln(x)=7\ln(x)\]divide both sides by ln(x) to get: 3 = 7 In this case the flaw is in dividing by zero.
 one year ago

asnaseerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
good find @TuringTest  snippet from that article: A common source of errors in dealing with complex logarithms is to assume that identities satisfied by ln extend to complex numbers. It is true that \(e^{Log z} = z\) for all z ≠ 0 (this is what it means for Log z to be a logarithm of z), but the identity \(Log e^z = z\) fails for z outside the strip S. For this reason, one cannot always apply Log to both sides of an identity \(e^z = e^w\) to deduce z = w. Also, the identity Log(z1z2) = Log z1 + Log z2 can fail: the two sides can differ by an integer multiple of 2πi
 one year ago

asnaseerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
Again the key point here is that ln(i) is a MULTIVALUED function
 one year ago

TuringTestBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
Yes, it discusses two ways to fix the problem, one by restricting the domain, the other by some Reimann manifold craziness I won't pretend to understand. New to me :)
 one year ago

asnaseerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
The Reimann manifold is way beyond my understanding as well :)
 one year ago

KainuiBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
Totally awesome, thank you both.
 one year ago
See more questions >>>
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.