At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions.

See more answers at brainly.com

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions

This ought to be interesting

|dw:1352873514894:dw|

And what exactly were you asked to do with that?

not sure if it's the notation that is throwing me off?

|dw:1352873934959:dw|

the internal angle sum of a triangle is 180°
the internal angle sum of a quadrilateral is 360°

are the lines QM and RN parallel by any chance?

I wasn't sure, but I tried under that assumption.

oh the answer is 84 by the way. This isn't what I got

yup just tried again. is anyone actually trying this?

im trying

i dont think those lines could be parallel

|dw:1352875825955:dw|

|dw:1352876464319:dw|
More assumptions

I have to give up! If someone figures it out please post it. I really don't know.

What's the answer? 84? if it's 84 then its parallel...

how did you work that out?

|dw:1352887526794:dw|

Bro, there's no evidence that suggests MPN is isosceles