A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
haridas_mandal
 2 years ago
Statement AEnergy is the cause and work is the effect.
Statement twoEnergy is a scalar but work is a vector product
Optionsa) Both A, B wrong b) A is right B is wrong c) A is wrong B is right d) Both A , B are right
haridas_mandal
 2 years ago
Statement AEnergy is the cause and work is the effect. Statement twoEnergy is a scalar but work is a vector product Optionsa) Both A, B wrong b) A is right B is wrong c) A is wrong B is right d) Both A , B are right

This Question is Closed

Schrodinger
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Work = Force*Distance in the most generalized way possible. In terms of vectors, \[W = F*D\cos \theta\]Where the asterisk is just plain old multiplication. \[W = F*D\]Where F and D are both vectors, and the asterisk represents a Dot Product operation. That being said, what happens whenever you take the dot product of two vectors? i.e., what is produced?

haridas_mandal
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Question is not that. Question posed by my daughter is about statement A whether statement A is Sacrosanct as internal energy in a static body does not necessarily causes work done. We need an answer which should qualify both the statements.Anyway thankx

haridas_mandal
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Thanks for your response partner. But question remains unresolved. State B that energy is a scalar and work is a vector is wrong and there is no ambiguity. In statement A it says energy is the cause and work is the effect is true but is it universally true. As my daughter puts it: Internal energy always playing havoc with the atoms and molecules but in its equilibrium state is it producing any work as we define work Force x displacement? Her argument goes beyond internal energy as she asks when she pushes the wall it does not move an inch though her body used up some energy in the process. Therefore could there be a rider in that statement A though without energy nothing could be displaced ( rather as she puts it , there has to be a transfer of energy, or conversion of one state to another state) I think we can sought help from others as well .That's Physics it is as simple and equally complicated in a developing country like India or Africa and at NASA.
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.