Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

haridas_mandal Group Title

Statement A-Energy is the cause and work is the effect. Statement two-Energy is a scalar but work is a vector product Options-a) Both A, B wrong b) A is right B is wrong c) A is wrong B is right d) Both A , B are right

  • 2 years ago
  • 2 years ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. Schrodinger Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Work = Force*Distance in the most generalized way possible. In terms of vectors, \[W = ||F||*||D||\cos \theta\]Where the asterisk is just plain old multiplication. \[W = F*D\]Where F and D are both vectors, and the asterisk represents a Dot Product operation. That being said, what happens whenever you take the dot product of two vectors? i.e., what is produced?

    • 2 years ago
  2. haridas_mandal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Question is not that. Question posed by my daughter is about statement A whether statement A is Sacrosanct as internal energy in a static body does not necessarily causes work done. We need an answer which should qualify both the statements.Anyway thankx

    • 2 years ago
  3. haridas_mandal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Thanks for your response partner. But question remains unresolved. State B that energy is a scalar and work is a vector is wrong and there is no ambiguity. In statement A it says energy is the cause and work is the effect is true but is it universally true. As my daughter puts it: Internal energy always playing havoc with the atoms and molecules but in its equilibrium state is it producing any work as we define work Force x displacement? Her argument goes beyond internal energy as she asks when she pushes the wall it does not move an inch though her body used up some energy in the process. Therefore could there be a rider in that statement A though without energy nothing could be displaced ( rather as she puts it , there has to be a transfer of energy, or conversion of one state to another state) I think we can sought help from others as well .That's Physics it is as simple and equally complicated in a developing country like India or Africa and at NASA.

    • 2 years ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.