anonymous
  • anonymous
How would i find the missing side lengths of this triangle
Mathematics
chestercat
  • chestercat
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

anonymous
  • anonymous
the first 2 sides of the triangle have to be greater than the third, when you add them together
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1352937085768:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
set up an equation

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
Its not pathagorean thorem?
anonymous
  • anonymous
No because you have two unknown sides.
anonymous
  • anonymous
So how would you find two unknown side lengths that are radicals ?
anonymous
  • anonymous
pythagorean theorem for this problem would look like: |dw:1352937549063:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
This doesnt help you find the side lengths.
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok i get that
anonymous
  • anonymous
so how would you set up an equation to solve for the unknown side lengths
anonymous
  • anonymous
so since you know the degrees of your triangle you can set up an equation. I'll show u.
anonymous
  • anonymous
k
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1352937702279:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
i calculated it and it just gives me deciamls which i believe the answers come out to be radicals
anonymous
  • anonymous
They are radicals, your calc is giving equivalent decimals
anonymous
  • anonymous
so how could i make them into radicals from decimal form?
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1352938216737:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1352938297593:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
is that the same as the decimal you got?
anonymous
  • anonymous
no
anonymous
  • anonymous
Its what im getting as a decimal.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.