Ace school

with brainly

  • Get help from millions of students
  • Learn from experts with step-by-step explanations
  • Level-up by helping others

A community for students.

First and second derivative analysis... Is this right so far?

Calculus1
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer

SIGN UP FOR FREE
http://screencast.com/t/5vrFs8Ggn
@zepdrix can you help?
analysis? what does that mean? like you're trying to find critical points and such? :o

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

Yeah, sorry... Max, min, inflections..
We have critical points anywhere the first derivative is 0 or UNDEFINED. They won't necessarily give us max or min values, but they are critical points, giving us some information :O \[f'(x)=\frac{ \sqrt{1+x} }{ \sqrt{1-x} }\cdot \frac{-1}{(1+x)^2}\]\[f'(x)=-\frac{1}{ \sqrt{1-x} \sqrt{1+x}}\]
Did i simplify that correctly? The first square root term you had, the -1/2 power, i just flipped the fraction so it wasn't negative anymore :O
Didn't know you can do that.. :/
Hmm if you graph this on wolfram, you'll see that the critical points are actually telling us where the asymptotes are located :D http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y%3D%28%281-x%29%2F%281%2Bx%29%29%5E%281%2F2%29
Maybe not the most relevant if we just want max and min values :) but still kinda neat.
err asymptote at -1 at least.. 1 something else is going on maybe.. hmm i can't tell by that graph hehe
blah i dunno XD
hmm, interesting. So we know a critical point is x=1 right?
yah it looks like x=1 and x=-1 are critical points. :D
If i did my math correctly.. :O i hope.
yeah, x=1, -1... But what about domain issues?
Oh good call, -1 isn't in our domain :3 so we don't care about that value.
hmmmmm... i'm a little bit confused... what IS our domain?
Hmmm so we can't divide by 0, so -1 is out. Anddd we can't take the square root of a negative number, meaning, Anything smaller than -1 is out (it will make the bottom negative). Anything larger than 1 is out (it will make the top negative). I think our domain looks like this. \[-1 < x \le 1\]
That looks right, automatically the end points of our domain are critical values right?
Because we can't attach a tangent line there?
Automatically? :o hmm i dunno. I just know that they're critical points because the first derivative told us so. It turns out that this is probably one of those weird functions where we'll end up having a MINIMUM at x=1 even though it doesn't have a slope of 0 there :D
Maybe that's what you were saying though :)
Well, our prof said that the end points of the domain are critical values, because we cannot attach a tangent line there... I'm not sure I really understand that, I had never heard that before.
Hmm interesting :D
I just found this: http://screencast.com/t/b4Jx1qLkQlo
cool :O
I'm still unsure of our critical points though, if x=-1 is outside of our domain, then we can't use that,.. so I guess just x=1 is critical?
yah, f'(x)=0 will give us critical points (which there were none). and also a and b are considered critical points. But b wasn't in our domain, so we don't even consider that point. Yah sounds good :D So just the lonely little x=1.
1 Attachment
I don't understand how there is a minimum at x=1.... We can't use a test value x>1 because it is out of our domain.. again :(
|dw:1353277622511:dw| True, we can't test both sides, all we can do is this.. see that it's decreasing on the left, and nonexistant on the right. So it's a minimum.
oohhh.. okay... now to move onto the second derivative tests... :)
I would probably use the simplified form that I had set up, I think it'll be easier to differentiate again :)
\[\huge f'(x)=-(x-1)^{-1/2}(x+1)^{-1/2}\]
right :D
Hmm this one is a pain in the butt, I'm coming up with: \[\huge f''(x)=\frac{x}{(x-1)^{3/2}(x+1)^{3/2}}\] It's quite possible that I made a mistake though :D So make sure you check your work.
I wanted to simplify it into a form that we can easily find inflection points from. So I combined the fractions :O
If you need to see my steps, I can post them :D
Yep got that too!
so... When f''(x) = 0 x = 0
If you refer back to our graph on wolfram, you'll see that makes sense! It changes from CCU to CCD around x=0!
barely.. lol
XD
If you ever use Wolfram, make sure you're looking at the "Real-valued plot" from the graph drop down box.
haha, yeah.. been there before.. I prefer the TI
oh fair enough c:

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question