At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
use momentum conservation equations or solve the problem using the concept of reduced mass from the cm frame...
no I figured out the different velocities and the compression I need to know why the max compression is when they are at the same velocity, I need a conceptual explanation rather than the computational one.
actually this result comes only when you solve it that way, there is no perfect conceptual reason for it, it is just the way nature works and you get to know that by solving some trivial equations
would it have anything to do with it being an elastic collision and that this may be the point in which the most kinetic energy has been converted in potential energy in the spring?
the 2 blocks will never collide with each other.
yes but I mean as a system it would be an elastic collision, such as if block II is thought of as a whole object not as a block and spring, it would be an elastic collision between the two systems
yes it will be elastic just to say that energy is not lost when the block collides with the spring...
and the energy would briefly be transferred into potential energy of the spring due to compression so when the velocities are the same that would mean the spring has its max potential energy is there a reason for that?
but is there a reason it happens at that moment?
no it just comes that way naturally and that is what the equations tell, due to the spring the first block slows and the second block fastens and it so becomes tht the compression is max, when both have the same velocity.
I see I understand what you mean I'm just trying to put that in terms of an explanation of the equations since I can see the graph of it but I'm having trouble putting it into a conceptual explanation past thats just the way it works.
strange but true,
ok thank you I'll try and go from there and I'll come back if anything else comes up thanks for your help.
welcome. where are you from ?
i mean which school ?
im still in high school this is for a physics ap course
in the united states ?
which school are you from?
It is because when both blocks are of the same velocity, their relative speed to each other is zero. I.e. The block does not see the other block moving. It is impossible to have the blocks phase through each other so their relative velocity at that time must be same, i.e. zero. When such an event happens, it also happens that the spring cannot be compressed further. Do you follow?
his question is why cant the spring compress further when such an event takes place?
As said, during that even, due to the blocks unable to phase into each other, the spring will not compress further. The blocks cannot go into one another.
Naturally, from logic, since the blocks cannot go into each other, they have to bounce away. So, during that time, the spring is max. compressed.
during such a collision the maximum compression doesnt mean that the spring is totallly compressed, it is the highest limit that the spring is compressed with the particular given speed of the blocks...
Yes, that's why the choice of words is max. compression. :)
yes that word is quite misleading...