Who might have the most direct information about an event that took place?
Friends and family of someone who experienced the event
Scholars who wrote about the event after it took place
A person who was involved in the event in some way
Anyone who opposed the event at the time it happened
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I'd probably go with the third option, a person who was involved in the event in some way. If they were involved, it often means that they would have a first-hand account of what occurred.
Friends and family may not know the whole story, and it might be biased information because of what they experienced. Scholars who write about it afterwards are separated by time and have to rely on what they can gather from other sources, so it's not the most direct method. And interviewing only the people opposed to it only brings one side of the story, not the most direct information that asking other people associated with it could bring.