At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
You can google it.
Szymbroska adresses death in the time she lives. Milosz adresses death personally. Szymbroska adresses death by saying that whether you think you are great or not you are still going to die. In her poem she shows that people think they shouldn't be messed with or that they doubt themselves, but either way theyre going to die.
Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.
In Ionesco's story people get aggravated with other peoples ways. They try to get rid of it by becoming rhinoceros's. In the end the humans are mostly gone and the rhinos are running wild. In milosz's poem he states that people may be great at one point but they will not always be. He showed that whether or not you are great at one point you will eventually fall. They are both showing that nazism is wrong but they state that in different ways.
There you go that should be it .
Or did you mean multiple choice?