Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

Summation limit:

See more answers at
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer


To see the expert answer you'll need to create a free account at Brainly

plzzzz just type the question when you post
Well it's better when I draw it out.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

The answer is 8 but I have no idea why. @math>philosophy @satellite73
the answer is 8? i don't think that is right
It shouldn't be 8. Are you still doing Riemann sums?
Well according to maple it's 8.
Then there must be a syntax error
I checked on wolfram too.
oh i am a dope
Let me double check.
the index is \(i\) but the expression is \(\frac{8}{n}\)
so it is a constant
Well I know that but then we have: |dw:1353736967140:dw|
\[\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{8}{n}=\frac{8}{n}+\frac{8}{n}+...+\frac{8}{n}\] where there are \(n\) terms and that gives you 8 for all \(n\)
How? If I said n =1 and then n=2 they aren't the same.
sigma of 1 is n , so
Ohh right!!!! I feel like an idiot....
are you summing over \(i\) or over \(n\) ?
Got it! Thanks everyone :) .

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question