Please help:)
Find the relation between \(\alpha\), \(\beta\), \(\gamma\) in the order that \(\alpha+\beta x+\gamma x^2\) may be expressible in one term in the factorial notation.

- ajprincess

- jamiebookeater

See more answers at brainly.com

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions

- perl

maybe you can google a similiar question, and i will reply

- perl

ok this is not what i am use to, algebra. what are you studying? what book

- perl

engineering mathematics by amit k awasthi

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

- ajprincess

hmm no. I am nt studying any particular book. this question was given to me by my lecturer.

- perl

what is a factorial polynomial, can you give me a definition

- perl

http://books.google.com/books?id=bwZKJ95CVTwC&pg=PA314&lpg=PA314&dq=Find+the+relation+between+%CE%B1,+%CE%B2,+%CE%B3+in+the+order+that+%CE%B1%2B%CE%B2x%2B%CE%B3x2+may+be+expressible+in+one+term+in+the+factorial+notation.&source=bl&ots=HBfAzq833r&sig=dcBssAwJZJpHrv1BK7f1RAZH1no&hl=en&sa=X&ei=eIOwUNHfEcSx0AH-nIDIBw&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Find%20the%20relation%20between%20%CE%B1%2C%20%CE%B2%2C%20%CE%B3%20in%20the%20order%20that%20%CE%B1%2B%CE%B2x%2B%CE%B3x2%20may%20be%20expressible%20in%20one%20term%20in%20the%20factorial%20notation.&f=false

- ajprincess

A factorial polynomial \(x^p\) is defined as
\(x^p=x(x-h)(x-2h)--------------(x-(p-1)h)\)
where p is a positive integer.

- hartnn

so, here take p= 2,
a+bx+cx^2=x(x-h)
and find relation between a,b,c.

- hartnn

but i am not sure...

- hartnn

p=2 to make factorial polynomial as quadratic

- ajprincess

jst a sec. am workng on it

- ajprincess

I am nt sure if what I have done is right.
a=0, b=-h and c=1. am I right @hartnn?

- hartnn

but that doesn't give u relation between them.......

- ajprincess

ya i am greatly confused

- ajprincess

When I googled my question i found this link.
http://acadmedia.wku.edu/Zhuhadar/eBooks/0977858251-STATISTICAL.pdf
page number 229. i am trying to understand it

- ajprincess

##### 1 Attachment

- anonymous

Suppose \(\alpha+\beta x+\gamma x^2=(u+vx)^2\). This means \(u^2+2uvx+v^2x^2=\alpha+\beta x+\gamma x^2.\) Equating coefficients, we have that \(u^2=\alpha\), \(2uv=\beta\), and \(v^2=\gamma\). These three equations imply \(2\sqrt{\alpha\gamma}=\beta\).

- anonymous

OH. You're doing Knuth-esque math. Okay, one second.

- anonymous

The above answer is technically true, but it's not what the professor is looking for. I'll explain what he's doing in a moment . . .

- anonymous

It would appear your professor made a significant error. He's using what's called the rising factorial and incorrectly at that. (He or she, whoever.) The following is the definition of the notation \(a^{(n)}\):
\[ a^{(n)}=a(a+1)(a+2)\cdots(a+n-1)=\prod_{1\le i\le n}\left(a+i-1\right).\]
What your professor wants, I believe, is the following:
Let \(\alpha+\beta x+\gamma x^2=(u+vx)^{(2)}\). Then, following the definition of the rising factorial, we have \[(u+vx)^{(2)}=\prod_{1 \le i \le 2}\left(u+vx+i-1\right)=(u+vx)(u+vx+1).\]
Expanding that our, we get \[(u+vx)(u+vx+1)=u^2+uvx+u+uvx+v^2x^2+vx=u^2+u+2uvx+vx+v^2x^2.\]
Since we have let \(\alpha+\beta x+\gamma x^2=(u+vx)^{(2)}\), we have that \(\alpha+\beta x+\gamma x^2=(u^2+u)+(2uv+v)x+v^2x^2.\)
From this we can conclude (by "equating coefficients") \(\alpha=u^2+u\), \(\beta=2uv+v\), and \(\gamma=v^2\).
To search for a relation between our three variables, substitue \(\pm \sqrt{\gamma}\) for \(v\): \(\beta=\pm2u\sqrt{\gamma}\pm\sqrt{\gamma}\). Solving this equation for \(u\), we see that \(u=\frac{\beta \pm \gamma}{\pm 2\sqrt{\gamma}}.\) Substitution of this into \(\alpha=u^2+u\) reveals \[\alpha=\frac{(\beta\pm \gamma)^2}{4\gamma}+\frac{\beta \pm \gamma}{\pm 2\sqrt{\gamma}},\] giving us the desired: a relation between \(\alpha, \beta\) and \(\gamma\).

- ajprincess

Thank you soooo much for the explanation:)

- ajprincess

is that way wrong? So which method should I use? Actually the answer I posted is not the answer my professor gave me. Actually she didnt give us any answer yet

- anonymous

I don't think the way was entirely wrong. It's just that the author misunderstood the definition of \(a^{(n)}\). You know what I mean?

- ajprincess

hmm no. sorry

- anonymous

When the writer of that post said
\[(a+bx)^{(2)}=(a+bx)[a+b(x-1)],\]
they were wrong and this messed up the entire problem. However, what they were _trying_ to do was right.

- anonymous

Does that make things more clear?

- ajprincess

ya it is. thank u soooo much:)

- anonymous

You're welcome. But, I'd like to thank you for the interesting problem!

- anonymous

Let me go ahead and recommend--if you're getting problems like this a lot--Donald E. Knuth's Concrete Mathematics. In there, there's all kinds of this craziness: falling factorials, rising factorials, ceiling functions, floor functions, summations, discrete calculus, etc. It seems to directly pertain to what you're doing, but I can't be certain.

- ajprincess

Thanks a lott:)

- anonymous

You're welcome! Have a wonderful weekend.

- ajprincess

Thanks nd wish u the same:)

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.