is there a method for proving the following without calculus or arguing by a diagram?

- anonymous

is there a method for proving the following without calculus or arguing by a diagram?

- chestercat

See more answers at brainly.com

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions

- anonymous

\[\forall x \ge 0 \text{ }\sin(x) \le x \]

- anonymous

@Callisto

- hba

Actually calculus is a very powerful tool to solve problems.So Most of the problems can be solved my Calculus,Therfore,they maybe other ways to solve questions without the use of calculus.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

- amistre64

yelling, shouting, and just being overall obnoxius tend to be used by kids today to prove their point :)

- hba

lol ^

- Callisto

I don't know if this works lol
-1

- anonymous

that works for 1=

- anonymous

|dw:1353765596912:dw|

- anonymous

yeah see that's what i meant by arguing from a diagram

- anonymous

maybe using the cosine rule we can convert the diagram proof into something more formal

- amistre64

arent most things proved by being vague and nondescript? or is it just my number theory text that does that?

- anonymous

haha

- anonymous

|dw:1353765811446:dw|

- anonymous

hmm are you using the area of a sector there? doesn't that require calculus?

- anonymous

Yes it doesn't. It just uses compare between to area.
And first one compare two line and curve.

- asnaseer

|dw:1353766410319:dw|

- asnaseer

from that diagram you can see that:
sin(x) = b/c

- asnaseer

also, from arc length, we know:
cx = s (assuming x is measured in radians)

- asnaseer

so x = s/c

- asnaseer

but s > d

- asnaseer

and d > b

- asnaseer

therefore sin(x) <= x

- asnaseer

I am starting the proof off from the basic definition of what sin(x) represents. so you need a diagram.

- asnaseer

@eigenschmeigen - what "methods" are you looking for if no diagrams can be used?

- hba

lol

- hba

He doesn't want geometry or Calculus.

- UnkleRhaukus

the sine of an angle in a triangle (with the opposite side equal to one,) is the length of the hypotenuse,
the hypotenuse is the longest side of a triangle
the angle \(x\) is a measure of the arc,
the arc is longer than the opposite side

- anonymous

my situation is that im using this fact as part of a solution to a problem on my analysis sheet, last time i thought i could state it without giveing a proof (at the top of the sheet it said we may assume basic properties of trig functions)
in the course we have only defined sinx in terms of its power series. should i just show that for 0

- anonymous

when i stated it without proof my tutor wrote "why?" next to it which means i should have given some form of proof

- asnaseer

aren't you contradicting yourself here - the power series is derived using calculus and you stated "no calculus allowed"?

- anonymous

no, in our course we are _defining_ the functions sin, cos, e^x as their power series, we are not deriving them through the maclauren.

- anonymous

But power series related to advance calcules!

- anonymous

x-sinx=x3/3!-x5/5!+-...>0 for all x>0

- anonymous

http://www.maths.ox.ac.uk/system/files/coursematerial/2012/2644/22/12MT-AnalysisI-extsyn13.pdf

- anonymous

of course i know its related. the way we are doing it (which is perfectly valid) is by defining the functions as the power series and deriving properties from there.

- anonymous

The link you have already suggested was about complex function, and we know there is no comparing in complex number. And also sinZ is not bounded.

- anonymous

its given as sinz but thats the general case of sinx...

- anonymous

im fed up. dont worry ill figure it out

- anonymous

@UnkleRhaukus , did you mean to say, "the sine of an angle in a triangle (with the *hypotenuse* equal to one,) is the length of the *opposite side*, . . . " ?

- UnkleRhaukus

whoops,and yeah @CliffSedge ,
its kinda hard when you dont draw it

- anonymous

Yeah, why wouldn't someone want a diagram?

- anonymous

you cant argue from a diagram in formal mathematics. i cant exactly draw a diagram and hand it in to my analysis tutor

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.