At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I know how to deal with resistors that a parallel or in a row but this configuration somehow confuses me.
Hmmmm I ended up with 50/3 Ohms for the total resistance.
Given that R3=R4, I think no electrons will flow down resistor 5.
But R5 is not as big as R3 so woudn´t some electrons prefer R5 over R3?
But they 'know' (because of repulsion of electrons in front of them, possibly) that R4 exists.
To find the equivalent resistance for this circuit you need to do a delta|wye conversion and then do your calculations.
I have never heard of a delta wye conversion.
tommy.. this network indeed is very complicated and you need to do a delta conversion .. however if R1/R3= R2/R4 then the its called a balanced circuit.. and it can be proved that.. no current flows through R5 and you can chuck it!
Ok, but this network ist not a balaced circuit because that resistor-ratio does not fit this network.
Use Δ→Y transform (fast), or use 2 loops and write down all Kirchhoff's circuit laws that apply (slow). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_Y
You can also remove R5 and use Thevenin's equivalent to find the fictitious generator between those terminals, then put R5 back in again. But this is longer.
using thevnin will give the load voltage and i don't think we can apply thevnin here, if you remove R5 then yes we can think of it
ok this is out of my league now :D
i guess its 300/11 ohm =27.27 ohm
Are my equations alright?
Answer is 685/24 = 28.54 Ω.
There is a mistake : J5 cannot have a minus sign in eq.1 and eq.2
Besides, I do not understand what UR means. Are you multiplying resistance with voltage? This will not lead you anywhere.
-.- of course. My mistake, the Us have to be Is. For the Equations one and two I was looking at the nodes in the middle.