Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

coolaidd

  • 3 years ago

(1) Write log9+1/3log729 as a single logarithm. (2) Write log[2]5-1/2log[2]169 as a single logarithm.

  • This Question is Closed
  1. jbovey
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    1) the 1/3 would just be the exponent of log(729) so log(729)^1/3 and then we use log rule log(ab)= log(a)+log(b) to get log(9)(729)^(1/3)

  2. jbovey
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    log(6561)^(1/3)

  3. coolaidd
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    so i solve that? @jbovey i got In9/in10

  4. coolaidd
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    is that for the #(2)?

  5. jbovey
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    no thats the answer for #1. Since it says just write as single log you wouldn't have to solve any further

  6. jbovey
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    it just wants you to use the log rules and combine

  7. coolaidd
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    oooh ok.. so what about #2?

  8. jbovey
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Im kind of confused by the way you wrote it. Can u draw the equation out so I can see?

  9. coolaidd
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yupp! hold on..

  10. jbovey
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I know you'll have to use log rule 3 which is log(a)-log(b)= log(a)/(b)

  11. coolaidd
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1354512532548:dw|

  12. jbovey
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    so are 5 and 169 the exponents?

  13. coolaidd
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    no those are regular sized..

  14. geoffb
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    The 2s are bases. She means \(\log_{2} 5 - \frac{1}{2} \log_{2} 169\)

  15. coolaidd
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    25 and 338?

  16. jbovey
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ohhhh sorry about that, thanks @geoffb

  17. geoffb
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    No problem. :)

  18. jbovey
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    wait so wouldnt that make 5 and 169 the exponents? @geoffb

  19. geoffb
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    No, it wouldn't.

  20. geoffb
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    You would just need to maintain base 2. It's nice because both logs use base 2.

  21. campbell_st
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    just a quick point on your first question... \[\frac{1}{3}\log(729) = \log(\sqrt[3]{729}) = \log(9)\] so then \[\log(9) + \frac{1}{3}\log(729) = \log(9) + \log(9) = \log(9 \times 9) = \log(81).. or... 2\log(9)\] just a suggestion... when compared to \[\log(\sqrt[3]{6561})\] not quite the same things...

  22. geoffb
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    So, like you said, you could start by moving the 1/2 up as an exponent. $$\large \log_{2} 5 - \frac{1}{2} \log_{2} 169 = \log_{2} 5 - \log_{2} 169^{\frac{1}{2}} = \log_{2} (\frac{5}{13})$$

  23. jbovey
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Thanks bro @campbell_st I was close lol

  24. coolaidd
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ok..so would that be the final answer @geoffb ?

  25. jbovey
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yeah thats the answer @coolaidd

  26. coolaidd
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    thanks!

  27. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy