At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
g(f(x)) = 4-(16-x^2) right so far?
so then it's 4 -16 +x^2
and -12 +x^2
cool, now do I plug in that g(x) for f(x)= 16-x^2
quite horrible, but just sub 4-x into the x.
like 16 -(4-x)
oh shoot, I forgot the exponent
16-(4-x)^2 is 16 (-4-x)(-4-x) which is 32 +8x+x^2
and then add that to the -12+x^2 from g(x)?
hmm, very close, but something's off isn't it?
16-(4-x)^2 is not 16 (-4-x)(-4-x) it's 16 - (4-x)(4-x) though.
ohhh, that may fix it
yeah. something will cancel out.
yea, it left +8x -x^2
but I still don't have it exactly right. I should be getting -x^2 +x +12 I think, but I've got a -12
note that (f+g)(x)=16-x^2 +4-x
hmm, so what do I need to do to solve it now?
well, first, lol which are you doing? addition or subtraction?
well, it says f+g, so I would assume addition
so, simplify this one and you're done. (f+g)(x)=16-x^2 +4-x
16-(12+x^2) +4-(12+x^2)? I think I screwed it up
or is it 16-(+8x -x^2) +4-(+8x -x^2) I'm not too sure of anything anymore
you don't need sub anything, just simplify as it's (f+g)(x) =f(x)+g(x)
oh, cuz I've already done all that. duh.
but when I add them together, I only get 20, the x^2's cancel out
I have an option for the answer to be -x^2-x+20
add 16-x^2 and 4-x only.
ok, well, thats it, obviously. but what happened to the 8x and +/-2x^2's? were those just wrong?
they weren't needed? :)
jesus christ. haha. well ok. sorry for being such a pain in the retrice thanks for the help though
hmm, well thats an odd substitution for @$$.... whatever lol
lol you're welcome