At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions.

See more answers at brainly.com

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions

ASA
SSS
SAS
not enough information

which one would it be?

so using the info i gave above, which one are you thinking?

sss?

sas?

:/

yes, SSS

you have 3 corresponding sides equal ----> SSS

you sure? I need to get all of these right. No "I think"

I'm very sure

I've done this many times so I'm very familiar with all the triangle congruence properties

would this be sas or asa?

|dw:1354653199859:dw|

notice this
|dw:1354653246131:dw|
so those two sides (which form the first S) are congruent

is the second one i just posted sas?

the other one, you have 2 sides and an angle (angle is between the two sides)

yep

I'm really confused with this one. :/

so, asa or not enough information?

not enough info
SSA always leads to "not enough info"

always

the options were asa, sss, sas, and no enough info. not ssa

i know, that's because SSA isn't a valid congruence property

I'm guessing this one is ASA?

yep

10. A C (1 point)
Alternate Exterior Angles
Alternate Interior Angles
Vertical Angles
They look the same.

I'm guessing vertical?

no, vertical angles look like this
|dw:1354653660952:dw|

oh yeah lol

exterior?

nope

they look the same? :/

you have 2 parallel lines and the angles are on the INSIDE of them

that's never a good reason in geometry

angles can't be parallel...so something is off

Oh wait.. does the = sign with the swirly thing on top mean congruent? xD

yeah

I probably got them mixed up! lol

okay, do you get it now?

that's fine, btw, to say "parallel" you type ||

yeah i already know the answer

what is it? And I wrote that down so I remember and don't act stupid :D

it's alternate interior angles
notice how they're on the inside of the parallel lines

sure

It's the same picture for the last two, just different questions

Corresponding Angles
Vertical Angles Theorem
Alternate Interior Angles
Supplementary Angles

I think corresponding..o_ o

no wait..vertical! Right? :D

yep vertical

nice catch

This last one I really don't know..

you know this
< A = < C

Yes, but I still don't know the answer

pleeaaasee help I am so behind because I started school late Dx

And I have a month to get everything completed

Angle: < A = < C
Angle:

asa?

right? :D

correct

the side is between the angles

I got 11/12. :D The mistake being my own..:/

thank you! What grade are you in?

which one did you miss

the first one. Sad thing is I thought I really had it. it wasn't one you helped me on.

can you help me on other ones? :D five questions?

same type of problem though right?

yes, by ASA;
yes, by AAS;
yes, by SAS;
No, the two triangles are not congruent.

Do you know these?

this is what we're given
|dw:1354655142386:dw|

we can find this out
|dw:1354655272312:dw|

so if you flip the second triangle you get this
|dw:1354655318737:dw|

so we can use ASA
angle S = angle E (A)
RS = FE (S)
angle R = angle F (A)

so, yes, by sas, ed?

no, ASA
and what do you mean by ed?

That's what it says..Nevermind. The only one with ASA is FD

yeah RT = FD

you have to look at my last drawing

Thanks, Jim! :) :)

yes, by SAS;
yes, by ASA;
yes, by AAS;
No, the two triangles are not congruent.

I'm sure I could do these if I tried, but I really wanna get these done. :/

give it a shot, try drawing it out like i did it

please.. I have so much other school things to do. :( and you never told me what grade you're in

|dw:1354656200143:dw|

|dw:1354656292746:dw|

since these two triangles have 2 completely different sets of angles, they cannot be congruent

so, it would be the last one?

yes

they're 2 completely different triangles, so they aren't congruent

Supply the missing reasons to complete the proof.
Given:

I feel so lazy but I really need these done

well i hate to tell you this, but laziness isn't a good excuse

how old are you

not sure how that matters or how that is relevent...

relevant*

Well, I know it's not relevant, but i'm curious. :I

Can you at least show me how to do the last one I posted. I actually am confused with that one.

any ideas on this current problem?

I don't get it.

you sound old.

Okay, I think it's SAS. Am I correct?

hello?