• anonymous
in contrast to classical conditioning operant conditioning requires
Social Sciences
  • Stacey Warren - Expert
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at in under 10 minutes. Go to now for free help!
  • anonymous
Before we answer this question, we need to understand the basic difference between CLASSICAL and OPERANT conditioning. ~~~~~~~ CLASSICAL conditioning is all about ASSOCIATION. For example, imagine this: I blow a whistle, and smack you over the head with a baseball bat, right afterward. I blow a whistle again. And again, I smack you over the head with a baseball bat. If I keep doing this, what will happen, the next time you hear me blow a whistle? You'll either duck, run, scream, or beat the living s/hit out of me. Why? Because you've LEARNED the order of events. You know what happens, after I blow the whistle. That's CLASSICAL conditioning. CLASSICAL conditioning is all about making mental connections, between two things. ~~~~~~~~~~~~ On the other hand, OPERANT conditioning is all about learning from REWARD, and PUNISHMENT. Very simply.... If you do something, and as a result, something that you LIKE happens, then you've been REWARDED. And you'll probably do it again. On the other hand, if you do something, and as a result, something that you DON'T LIKE happens, then that means you've been PUNISHED. And you probably won't do it again. Do you get that? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So, here's a big difference between CLASSICAL and OPERANT conditioning: In CLASSICAL conditioning, you don't need to actually do anything, in order to learn. Remember my example, with the baseball bat? All you ever had to do was stand there, and let me blow the whistle, and hit you with a baseball bat. You didn't have to do anything. I did all the work, and you did all the learning. On the other hand, in OPERANT conditioning, you actually have to DO something, in order to be either rewarded, or punished. You can't get a reward, or a punishment, if you don't actually DO something yourself. You get that? ~~~~~~~~~~~ So, let's go back to your question: "In contrast to classical conditioning, operant conditioning requires _____." What OPERANT conditioning requires is ACTIVE PARTICIPATION from the learner. That means that in OPERANT conditioning, the learner has to PERFORM AN ACTION, in order to learn from it.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.