When writing a paper that uses peer-reviewed journal articles that will be published in the future (say February 2013) but that have already been e-published (say November 2012), is it better to say, "A study to be published in February 2013..." or "A study that was electronically published in November 2012..." in the text of the paper? I have to follow this format, so I have to choose one of these two options. Also, how do you find the e-publication date if it is not listed on the article? I know it was e-published because I can access it, and it says copyright 2012, but the journal publicati
Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
Generally go with which publication it is from (ie. the year that the issue that it is in was published in) - urgh, hope that makes sense
Okay. Awesome. Will do. Do you know how to find the e-publication date when the article just says copyright 2012?
Hmm no, I would usually try to find the journal online and see when it was published but it can be tricky for some journals.