Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

sara1234 Group Title

helpp

  • one year ago
  • one year ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. sara1234 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    11. The civil rights cases of 1883 were significant because the Supreme Court concluded that (5 points) the black codes were constitutional. segregation was constitutional. states, not individuals, were prohibited from discriminating under the Fourteenth Amendment. Abraham Lincoln's proclamation ending slavery was unconstitutional. the citizenship rights of black Americans could not be denied because of the color of their skin.

    • one year ago
  2. sara1234 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    @Carl_Pham

    • one year ago
  3. Emine<3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Do you have any thoughts for this one? 0.o

    • one year ago
  4. sara1234 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    nope

    • one year ago
  5. sara1234 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    @dmezzullo

    • one year ago
  6. Emine<3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    well I go with the first one :P

    • one year ago
  7. Emine<3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Nevermind I think its the : states, not individuals, were prohibited from discriminating under the Fourteenth Amendment. ........

    • one year ago
  8. Emine<3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    The Civil Rights Cases, 109 US 3 (1883) Between 1866 and 1875, Congress passed several civil rights acts to implement the 13th and 14th Amendments during Reconstruction. The Civil Rights Act of 1875 was the most controversial because it imposed criminal penalties against businesses that discriminated on the basis of race. Many (white) people opposed to Reconstruction thought the Act infringed on their personal right of free association and "freedom of choice." When federal troops withdrew from the South in 1879, the Reconstruction Period officially came to a close. Southern states immediately began passing "Black Codes," local legislation that was designed to restrict the labor and freedom of African-Americans, and to ensure separation between the races. The Civil Rights Cases consolidated five cases on appeal from Circuit courts around the United States (see list) involving federal and constitutional law, and were brought before the Court during the 1882 Term (they were decided early in the 1883 Term). These cases raised the question of whether the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause could be applied to private citizens. In an 8-1 vote, the Supreme Court ruled the Civil Rights Act of 1875 was unconstitutional because neither the 13th nor 14th Amendments empowered Congress to legislate behavior in the private sector. The Court believed these Amendments were only to be extended to the States. By striking down civil rights legislation, the Court gave private citizens and businesses tacit permission to engage in overt acts of discrimination, and laid the groundwork for the "separate but equal" doctrine established in Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896).

    • one year ago
  9. Emine<3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    If that helps >.<

    • one year ago
  10. Carl_Pham Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    In these cases the Supreme Court ruled that the 14th Amendment (prohibiting discrimination by state law) did not apply to individuals acting in their private capacity. For example, while a state could not prohibit black children from attending public school, a private school could admit only whites, or only blacks, as it chose. The state could not enact a curfew only for blacks, but a bar-owner was free to refuse to serve blacks after 5 PM, or at all. It was a case of interpreting the text of the 14th Amendment as it was written, and not assuming the people who wrote it meant much more than they said -- that they intended to give Congress the power to criminalize individual acts of discrimination, but just forgot to write it that way. Note that states have always had the power to criminalize discrimination. Generally they have in such things as employment or the buyiing and selling of houses, but when it comes down to subtle things like who you want to serve in your business establishment, or whether you want to create a "members only" organization focussed on one particular group, they have treaded lightly, probably for fear of a vicious public backlash that might leave some legislators hanging from trees. Additionally, if either Congress or state legislatures were to prohibit discrimination in private membership, that would outlaw women's colleges, black colleges and scholarships, separate women-only gyms, force the NBA to adopt affirmative-action hiring of white players, and a whole lot of other stuff that give most people pause.

    • one year ago
  11. sara1234 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    so which answer do you think it is?

    • one year ago
  12. Carl_Pham Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Read what I wrote carefully. It's in there. But you'll have to do a LITTLE mental work.

    • one year ago
  13. jlongSwag27 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    do you know the answer its in what Carl wrote

    • one year ago
  14. sara1234 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yeah its states, not individuals, were prohibited from discriminating under the Fourteenth Amendment.

    • one year ago
  15. Emine<3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    so I was right....... :P

    • one year ago
  16. jlongSwag27 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yeah thats the answer good job:)

    • one year ago
  17. Emine<3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I said that point blank ... and listed how I found out....

    • one year ago
  18. Emine<3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    14:b 19:c 20:b :) good job

    • one year ago
  19. sara1234 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    14 wasnt b i got it wrong

    • one year ago
  20. Emine<3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    really? hhmmmm hold on lemme see

    • one year ago
  21. sara1234 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    no need i allready submited it

    • one year ago
  22. Emine<3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    okay... do good?

    • one year ago
  23. Emine<3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    well guess you did..... bye ^_^

    • one year ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.