A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
anonymous
 3 years ago
consider triangle DEF and triangle JKL,with DE=JK,EF=KL,and<EDF= KJL. Two sides and a nonincluded angle of one triangle are congruent to two sides and a nonincluded angle of the other triangle.From your solution to part A,is it correct to conclude that triangle DEF must be congruent to triangle JKL?answer yes or no and explain your answer using complete sentences.
anonymous
 3 years ago
consider triangle DEF and triangle JKL,with DE=JK,EF=KL,and<EDF= KJL. Two sides and a nonincluded angle of one triangle are congruent to two sides and a nonincluded angle of the other triangle.From your solution to part A,is it correct to conclude that triangle DEF must be congruent to triangle JKL?answer yes or no and explain your answer using complete sentences.

This Question is Closed

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0dw:1355538172961:dw

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0can u explain the question because i cant understand

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Given two pairs of congruent segments and a pair of congruent angles opposite a pair of congruent segments.dw:1355538753912:dw can you conclude that the two sides are congruent?

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0can you conclude that the two TRIANGLES are congruent?

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0yes because if two angles of a triangle are congruent,then the sides opposite those angles are congruent

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0dw:1355539208800:dw

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0yesdw:1355539566118:dw

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0dw:1355539506783:dw

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0? how do i explain it

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i'll think first of how to say it correctly, coz im not good with words.

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0take ur time its alright

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Let's begin with an isosceles triangle, and extending the base to one side.dw:1355539972915:dw

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0at the vertex, draw a segment to the extension of the base dw:1355540028031:dw

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0two triangles are formed satisfying the conditionsdw:1355540083358:dwdw:1355540128449:dw

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0you can construct your own explanation following the steps with illustration given above.
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.