Ace school

with brainly

  • Get help from millions of students
  • Learn from experts with step-by-step explanations
  • Level-up by helping others

A community for students.

Write the contrapositive of the conditional statement below. “ n is a prime number implies that n=2 or n is an odd number.” Your answer must contain a conjunction in its premise.

Mathematics
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer

SIGN UP FOR FREE
So in general, the contrapositive of the statement (\(\,p\implies q\)) is \((\neg \,q\implies \neg \,p\)). In this case, both your p and q are other sentences. Can you tell me what the "p" is in your conditional statement?
n is a prime number
Right. And the "q"?

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

n is an odd number
Almost. The "q" in your statement is "n=2 or n is an odd number." Notice that there's an "or" in this statement, so even this can be broken down into something like "q OR r," where q is "n=2", and r is "n is an odd number."
oh i
SEE
So the statement "n is a prime number implies that n=2 or n is an odd number" can be rewritten as \[p\implies (q \vee r)\]
if n is not a odd number then n is not a prime number or n = 2
You're very close, and certainly have the right idea. The contrapositive of \(p\implies (q\vee r)\) is \(\neg(q\vee r)\implies \neg p\). Can you tell me what \(\neg(q\vee r)\) can be rewritten as?
not sure
This is a thing called "De Morgan's Law." It says that \[\neg(q\vee r) \Longleftrightarrow (\neg \,q) \wedge(\neg\,r) \]Can you translate this back into our statements?
im confused
So if q is "n=2," what is ~q?
not =2
|dw:1355893931180:dw|
Right. And if r is "n is an odd number," what is ~r?
n is not an odd number
Bingo. So if we then combine those two statements, ~q AND ~r can be written as "n is not 2, and n is not an odd number." Make sense?
yes
Great. Then the contrapositive of your original statement should be "If n is not 2, and n is not an odd number, then n is not prime."
that the answer it was that simple?
That was it. Did it all make sense?
You almost had it the first time, you just got a little mixed up with the second half of the statement.
yes but what does it mean by Your answer must contain a conjunction in its premise.
That just means that it has to have "and" somewhere in the statement. So the way it's written, it's fine. If we had written it as "If n is an even integer greater than two, then n is not prime" instead, which says the same thing, it would not be the correct solution because it does not contain "and."
oh i see thanks so much!!
You're welcome.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question