please help me fast!which lecture series by prof.Walter Lewin should I watch?I mean there is fall 1999 and fall 2010...which series includes every resources(video lecture,problems,notes)?
Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
i may suggest
they are good but i hav never watch 2010
okay,but i couldnt find problem sets in 1999 and there is only less videos in 2010
ya that is why i hav suggested 1999
no need of problem set
our indian walter lewin or hc verma is good enough in giving hard core problem
Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.
but raj,even after reading HCV,i am not getting conceptual depth..why?how should i study that book..people say it is a complete book for IIT JEE and i understand each line..but cant solve problems
For conceptual depth, I suggest reading 'Fundamentals of physics- Halliday, Resnick & Walker' and watching those lectures. HCV is the best as far as problems (for JEE) are concerned. Practice is the only way you can master problems.
@rajathsbhat how to read them conceptually?
what do you mean?
@rajathsbhat i mean just reading them like novels is not enough
@rajathsbhat i mean from newtons first law i know f=0=>a=0..is it conceptual depth?