anonymous
  • anonymous
What is a quartic function with only the two real zeroes given? x = –1 and x = –3
Mathematics
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

anonymous
  • anonymous
You can go with (x + 1)^2 times (x + 3)^2 The reason this works is that it will give you a x^4 term and you still have only the 2 roots. Roots are of the form: (x - root) for you factors.
anonymous
  • anonymous
So, basically you have both roots twice, so that's why each factor has a 2 on it for an exponent.
anonymous
  • anonymous
You could also have put a 3 on one of them and left the other root as a single power (no exponent)

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
Is this making sense to you?
anonymous
  • anonymous
I am lost completely
anonymous
  • anonymous
np, I'll give you a little more detail: First off, a quartic polynomial function has as its highest exponent, an x^4 term. That means that if you have an equation of the form: y = (x - root1)(x - root2)(x - root3)(x - root4) you will have quartic function. But we can have only 2 different roots, so a good choice is to have root1 twice and root 2 twice: y = [(x - root1)^2][(x - root2)^2]
anonymous
  • anonymous
That's the same as: y = (x - root1)(x - root1)(x - root2)(x - root2) which also has root1 twice and root2 twice. It's just writing out the factors without the exponents. This equation will give you 0 for "y" if you replace x with either root, which is what you want to solve this problem.
anonymous
  • anonymous
And to finish this off, you are given x = -1 and x = -3 as the only 2 roots you can have. And since the factor to give "0" using the root is: (x - root) one factor is [x - (-1)] which is (x + 1) the other is [x - (-3)] which is (x + 3) So, your polynomial is: y = (x + 1)(x + 1)(x + 3)(x + 3)
anonymous
  • anonymous
You have other choices, but the above polynomial works. You could also have: y = (x + 1)(x + 3)(x + 3)(x + 3) or y = (x + 1)(x + 1)(x + 1)(x + 3) Both of those are quartics having only 2 different roots. That should make it all clearer now. Now are you good on this?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Here's a graph of the first solution
1 Attachment
anonymous
  • anonymous
sorta so which one would it be? y = x4 – 4x3 – 4x2 – 4x – 3 y = –x4 + 4x3 + 4x2 + 4x + 3 y = x4 + 4x3 + 3x2 + 4x – 4 y = x4 + 4x3 + 4x2 + 4x +3 I understand how you did that i just don't know which one it will be.
anonymous
  • anonymous
anonymous
  • anonymous
I didn't know that you had choices. That changes the whole way you approach this problem. You can solve it 2 ways that I know of. The first way rst and the best and fastest is to perfrom synthetic division on each choice until you hit upon the choice that has only those 2 roots.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Number #1 is out because -1 is not a root. So, I eliminated that one so far.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Number 2 is out because it also has +1 as a root.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Are you sure you wrote those choices down correctly?
anonymous
  • anonymous
I actually copied and paste so yeah
anonymous
  • anonymous
And the roots are supposed to be -1 and -3 ?
anonymous
  • anonymous
yeah that is why i couldn't figure it out. That is what confused me
anonymous
  • anonymous
It looks like like the last one works. I tried it again.
anonymous
  • anonymous
okay thanks again
anonymous
  • anonymous
you're welcome.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.