A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
anonymous
 3 years ago
If i get mad is it ok to slap a chicken????
anonymous
 3 years ago
If i get mad is it ok to slap a chicken????

This Question is Closed

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3That depends on the amplitude of the anger waves that are produced. The wavelength also is an important factor: do not let your \(\lambda\) go too high. Allow your thoughts to have a low wavelength so there is a Rayleigh Scattering just like in the case of light.

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3You posted this question in mathematics; deal with it ;)

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3Actually it was all physics :'(

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Anger waves? Do you have scientific proof of the existence of such "waves"?

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3And it was incorrect physics as @rajathsbhat mentioned.

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0still the way you broke it down

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3@x1xofxaxkndx Are you kidding me? :P Real physicists will use their neithercreatednordestroyed energy to hit me down with rocks ;)

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0but why would u ever slap a chicken lol

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0yeah yeah he's getting a medal for that, @1ofakind

AravindG
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1anger waves =K* sin(x+phi) phi denotes change of anger with time k is magnitude of anger

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3DO NOT LET THE \(\rm A\) go too high in \(\rm A\sin(wt)\).

AravindG
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1different textbooks refer to magnitude as A/K ..dont get confused

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3Assume that \(\alpha\) was the time that Aravind posted his first reply. I essentially did the same thing as the body "Aravind" did at \(A_{\alpha}\). Therefore \(A_{\alpha} = {P}_{\alpha} \) where P stands for the body "Parth".

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Nerds. Who doesn't love us?

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3Actually \(A_{\alpha} = {P_{\alpha + 38}}\)

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3^ That's spacetime by the way (for those who aren't familiar) :)

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3Also, because of the the Accelerating Universe theory, I guess that \(P_{\alpha + 38}\) has taken more space than \(A_{\alpha}\).

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3But the Theory of Relativity again comes in.

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3So that ^^ has happened relative to the Universe.

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3@AravindG I was talking about the amplitude, which again matters a lot.

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3@AravindG The amplitude depends upon the magnitude, and viceversa. We have another case of a virtuous circle.

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3Wanna talk more about economy? ;)

AravindG
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1hmm...bt the wave eqn can be disturbed considering factors like fiffraction and interference...in those cases an additional factor comes knons as 'G ' as seen in my name

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3Let's get to philosophy: The term “mad” you use, is very ambiguous.

karatechopper
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0You know...this whole economy and physics stuff..look at the questions again. If I get mad is it ok to slap a chicken? Well...it can also pertain to the topic of animal abuse.. :P

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3But he posted it in mathematics ;)

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3Mathematics is associated with the theoretical dimensions.

AravindG
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1consider the graph y=mad^2 ..we see that its an incresing function starting from mad=0

karatechopper
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0But u see..his question pertains to soo many subjects! It can also pertain to English! Use your punctuation!!

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3OK, I'd try to get some arithmetic in it. It has been estimated that there are more chickens than there are humans, so it is okay to slap a chicken.

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3If people kill chickens, why can't you slap it?

AravindG
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1the points in the graph where it touches chicken is an occurence of slaps

karatechopper
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I don't kill the chicken. I don't eat it!!! Pure Vegetarian.

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0why is it ok to slap a chicken just because there are more chickens than humans? That's a bad argument

karatechopper
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Chicken be flying pretty high!

AravindG
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1dw:1356109907727:dw ya i gave the chicken iron man's boots

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3Iron Man doesn't have such small boots. Did you mean: ANTMAN?

AravindG
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1whatever @ParthKohli let it fly !

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3What if the chicken is a male? Your usage of the pronoun would be pretty incorrect.

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0lol wow this is still going on

AravindG
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1sorry i havent revised taht part maybe @satellite73 can help

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I don't think it is wrong to use that pronoun........although I don't know the exact rules of pronoun usage....
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.