Got Homework?
Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing

This Question is Closed

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
That depends on the amplitude of the anger waves that are produced. The wavelength also is an important factor: do not let your \(\lambda\) go too high. Allow your thoughts to have a low wavelength so there is a Rayleigh Scattering just like in the case of light.
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
You posted this question in mathematics; deal with it ;)
 one year ago

x1xofxaxkndxBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
LMAO I LOVE IT!!!!!
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
Actually it was all physics :'(
 one year ago

rajathsbhatBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Anger waves? Do you have scientific proof of the existence of such "waves"?
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
And it was incorrect physics as @rajathsbhat mentioned.
 one year ago

x1xofxaxkndxBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
still the way you broke it down
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
@x1xofxaxkndx Are you kidding me? :P Real physicists will use their neithercreatednordestroyed energy to hit me down with rocks ;)
 one year ago

Tiffany2012Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
but why would u ever slap a chicken lol
 one year ago

rajathsbhatBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
yeah yeah he's getting a medal for that, @1ofakind
 one year ago

AravindGBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
anger waves =K* sin(x+phi) phi denotes change of anger with time k is magnitude of anger
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
DO NOT LET THE \(\rm A\) go too high in \(\rm A\sin(wt)\).
 one year ago

AravindGBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
different textbooks refer to magnitude as A/K ..dont get confused
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
Assume that \(\alpha\) was the time that Aravind posted his first reply. I essentially did the same thing as the body "Aravind" did at \(A_{\alpha}\). Therefore \(A_{\alpha} = {P}_{\alpha} \) where P stands for the body "Parth".
 one year ago

rajathsbhatBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Nerds. Who doesn't love us?
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
Actually \(A_{\alpha} = {P_{\alpha + 38}}\)
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
^ That's spacetime by the way (for those who aren't familiar) :)
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
Also, because of the the Accelerating Universe theory, I guess that \(P_{\alpha + 38}\) has taken more space than \(A_{\alpha}\).
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
But the Theory of Relativity again comes in.
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
So that ^^ has happened relative to the Universe.
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
@AravindG I was talking about the amplitude, which again matters a lot.
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
@AravindG The amplitude depends upon the magnitude, and viceversa. We have another case of a virtuous circle.
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
Wanna talk more about economy? ;)
 one year ago

AravindGBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
hmm...bt the wave eqn can be disturbed considering factors like fiffraction and interference...in those cases an additional factor comes knons as 'G ' as seen in my name
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
Let's get to philosophy: The term “mad” you use, is very ambiguous.
 one year ago

karatechopperBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
You know...this whole economy and physics stuff..look at the questions again. If I get mad is it ok to slap a chicken? Well...it can also pertain to the topic of animal abuse.. :P
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
But he posted it in mathematics ;)
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
Mathematics is associated with the theoretical dimensions.
 one year ago

AravindGBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
consider the graph y=mad^2 ..we see that its an incresing function starting from mad=0
 one year ago

karatechopperBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
But u see..his question pertains to soo many subjects! It can also pertain to English! Use your punctuation!!
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
OK, I'd try to get some arithmetic in it. It has been estimated that there are more chickens than there are humans, so it is okay to slap a chicken.
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
If people kill chickens, why can't you slap it?
 one year ago

AravindGBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
the points in the graph where it touches chicken is an occurence of slaps
 one year ago

karatechopperBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
I don't kill the chicken. I don't eat it!!! Pure Vegetarian.
 one year ago

rajathsbhatBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
why is it ok to slap a chicken just because there are more chickens than humans? That's a bad argument
 one year ago

AravindGBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
dw:1356109814936:dw
 one year ago

karatechopperBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Chicken be flying pretty high!
 one year ago

AravindGBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
dw:1356109907727:dw ya i gave the chicken iron man's boots
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
Iron Man doesn't have such small boots. Did you mean: ANTMAN?
 one year ago

AravindGBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
whatever @ParthKohli let it fly !
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
What if the chicken is a male? Your usage of the pronoun would be pretty incorrect.
 one year ago

x1xofxaxkndxBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
lol wow this is still going on
 one year ago

AravindGBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
sorry i havent revised taht part maybe @satellite73 can help
 one year ago

rajathsbhatBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
I don't think it is wrong to use that pronoun........although I don't know the exact rules of pronoun usage....
 one year ago
See more questions >>>
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.