## x1xofxaxkndx 2 years ago If i get mad is it ok to slap a chicken????

1. ParthKohli

That depends on the amplitude of the anger waves that are produced. The wavelength also is an important factor: do not let your $$\lambda$$ go too high. Allow your thoughts to have a low wavelength so there is a Rayleigh Scattering just like in the case of light.

2. ParthKohli

You posted this question in mathematics; deal with it ;)

3. x1xofxaxkndx

LMAO I LOVE IT!!!!!

4. ParthKohli

Actually it was all physics :'(

5. rajathsbhat

Anger waves? Do you have scientific proof of the existence of such "waves"?

6. ParthKohli

And it was incorrect physics as @rajathsbhat mentioned.

7. x1xofxaxkndx

still the way you broke it down

8. ParthKohli

@x1xofxaxkndx Are you kidding me? :P Real physicists will use their neither-created-nor-destroyed energy to hit me down with rocks ;)

9. Tiffany2012

but why would u ever slap a chicken lol

10. rajathsbhat

yeah yeah he's getting a medal for that, @1ofakind

11. x1xofxaxkndx

hey hey

12. AravindG

anger waves =K* sin(x+phi) phi denotes change of anger with time k is magnitude of anger

13. ParthKohli

lawl

14. Tiffany2012

wow

15. ParthKohli

DO NOT LET THE $$\rm A$$ go too high in $$\rm A\sin(wt)$$.

16. AravindG

different textbooks refer to magnitude as A/K ..dont get confused

17. rajathsbhat

lol AravindG x)

18. ParthKohli

Assume that $$\alpha$$ was the time that Aravind posted his first reply. I essentially did the same thing as the body "Aravind" did at $$A_{\alpha}$$. Therefore $$A_{\alpha} = {P}_{\alpha}$$ where P stands for the body "Parth".

19. rajathsbhat

Nerds. Who doesn't love us?

20. ParthKohli

Actually $$A_{\alpha} = {P_{\alpha + 38}}$$

21. ParthKohli

^ That's spacetime by the way (for those who aren't familiar) :)

22. ParthKohli

Also, because of the the Accelerating Universe theory, I guess that $$P_{\alpha + 38}$$ has taken more space than $$A_{\alpha}$$.

23. ParthKohli

But the Theory of Relativity again comes in.

24. ParthKohli

So that ^^ has happened relative to the Universe.

25. ParthKohli

@AravindG I was talking about the amplitude, which again matters a lot.

26. karatechopper

....Man..

27. ParthKohli

@AravindG The amplitude depends upon the magnitude, and vice-versa. We have another case of a virtuous circle.

28. ParthKohli

Wanna talk more about economy? ;)

29. AravindG

hmm...bt the wave eqn can be disturbed considering factors like fiffraction and interference...in those cases an additional factor comes knons as 'G ' as seen in my name

30. AravindG

*diffraction

31. ParthKohli

Let's get to philosophy: The term “mad” you use, is very ambiguous.

32. karatechopper

You know...this whole economy and physics stuff..look at the questions again. If I get mad is it ok to slap a chicken? Well...it can also pertain to the topic of animal abuse.. :P

33. ParthKohli

But he posted it in mathematics ;)

34. ParthKohli

Mathematics is associated with the theoretical dimensions.

35. AravindG

consider the graph y=mad^2 ..we see that its an incresing function starting from mad=0

36. rajathsbhat

i agree with kc

37. karatechopper

But u see..his question pertains to soo many subjects! It can also pertain to English! Use your punctuation!!

38. ParthKohli

OK, I'd try to get some arithmetic in it. It has been estimated that there are more chickens than there are humans, so it is okay to slap a chicken.

39. ParthKohli

If people kill chickens, why can't you slap it?

40. AravindG

the points in the graph where it touches chicken is an occurence of slaps

41. karatechopper

I don't kill the chicken. I don't eat it!!! Pure Vegetarian.

42. rajathsbhat

why is it ok to slap a chicken just because there are more chickens than humans? That's a bad argument

43. AravindG

|dw:1356109814936:dw|

44. ParthKohli

lol

45. karatechopper

Chicken be flying pretty high!

46. AravindG

|dw:1356109907727:dw| ya i gave the chicken iron man's boots

47. rajathsbhat

lol x)

48. ParthKohli

Iron Man doesn't have such small boots. Did you mean: ANTMAN?

49. AravindG

whatever @ParthKohli let it fly !

50. ParthKohli

What if the chicken is a male? Your usage of the pronoun would be pretty incorrect.

51. x1xofxaxkndx

lol wow this is still going on

52. AravindG

sorry i havent revised taht part maybe @satellite73 can help

53. rajathsbhat

I don't think it is wrong to use that pronoun........although I don't know the exact rules of pronoun usage....