anonymous
  • anonymous
If i get mad is it ok to slap a chicken????
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
That depends on the amplitude of the anger waves that are produced. The wavelength also is an important factor: do not let your \(\lambda\) go too high. Allow your thoughts to have a low wavelength so there is a Rayleigh Scattering just like in the case of light.
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
You posted this question in mathematics; deal with it ;)
anonymous
  • anonymous
LMAO I LOVE IT!!!!!

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Actually it was all physics :'(
anonymous
  • anonymous
Anger waves? Do you have scientific proof of the existence of such "waves"?
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
And it was incorrect physics as @rajathsbhat mentioned.
anonymous
  • anonymous
still the way you broke it down
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
@x1xofxaxkndx Are you kidding me? :P Real physicists will use their neither-created-nor-destroyed energy to hit me down with rocks ;)
anonymous
  • anonymous
but why would u ever slap a chicken lol
anonymous
  • anonymous
yeah yeah he's getting a medal for that, @1ofakind
anonymous
  • anonymous
hey hey
AravindG
  • AravindG
anger waves =K* sin(x+phi) phi denotes change of anger with time k is magnitude of anger
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
lawl
anonymous
  • anonymous
wow
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
DO NOT LET THE \(\rm A\) go too high in \(\rm A\sin(wt)\).
AravindG
  • AravindG
different textbooks refer to magnitude as A/K ..dont get confused
anonymous
  • anonymous
lol AravindG x)
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Assume that \(\alpha\) was the time that Aravind posted his first reply. I essentially did the same thing as the body "Aravind" did at \(A_{\alpha}\). Therefore \(A_{\alpha} = {P}_{\alpha} \) where P stands for the body "Parth".
anonymous
  • anonymous
Nerds. Who doesn't love us?
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Actually \(A_{\alpha} = {P_{\alpha + 38}}\)
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
^ That's spacetime by the way (for those who aren't familiar) :)
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Also, because of the the Accelerating Universe theory, I guess that \(P_{\alpha + 38}\) has taken more space than \(A_{\alpha}\).
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
But the Theory of Relativity again comes in.
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
So that ^^ has happened relative to the Universe.
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
@AravindG I was talking about the amplitude, which again matters a lot.
karatechopper
  • karatechopper
....Man..
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
@AravindG The amplitude depends upon the magnitude, and vice-versa. We have another case of a virtuous circle.
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Wanna talk more about economy? ;)
AravindG
  • AravindG
hmm...bt the wave eqn can be disturbed considering factors like fiffraction and interference...in those cases an additional factor comes knons as 'G ' as seen in my name
AravindG
  • AravindG
*diffraction
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Let's get to philosophy: The term “mad” you use, is very ambiguous.
karatechopper
  • karatechopper
You know...this whole economy and physics stuff..look at the questions again. If I get mad is it ok to slap a chicken? Well...it can also pertain to the topic of animal abuse.. :P
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
But he posted it in mathematics ;)
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Mathematics is associated with the theoretical dimensions.
AravindG
  • AravindG
consider the graph y=mad^2 ..we see that its an incresing function starting from mad=0
anonymous
  • anonymous
i agree with kc
karatechopper
  • karatechopper
But u see..his question pertains to soo many subjects! It can also pertain to English! Use your punctuation!!
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
OK, I'd try to get some arithmetic in it. It has been estimated that there are more chickens than there are humans, so it is okay to slap a chicken.
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
If people kill chickens, why can't you slap it?
AravindG
  • AravindG
the points in the graph where it touches chicken is an occurence of slaps
karatechopper
  • karatechopper
I don't kill the chicken. I don't eat it!!! Pure Vegetarian.
anonymous
  • anonymous
why is it ok to slap a chicken just because there are more chickens than humans? That's a bad argument
AravindG
  • AravindG
|dw:1356109814936:dw|
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
lol
karatechopper
  • karatechopper
Chicken be flying pretty high!
AravindG
  • AravindG
|dw:1356109907727:dw| ya i gave the chicken iron man's boots
anonymous
  • anonymous
lol x)
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Iron Man doesn't have such small boots. Did you mean: ANTMAN?
AravindG
  • AravindG
whatever @ParthKohli let it fly !
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
What if the chicken is a male? Your usage of the pronoun would be pretty incorrect.
anonymous
  • anonymous
lol wow this is still going on
AravindG
  • AravindG
sorry i havent revised taht part maybe @satellite73 can help
anonymous
  • anonymous
I don't think it is wrong to use that pronoun........although I don't know the exact rules of pronoun usage....

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.