Quantcast

A community for students. Sign up today!

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

corey1234

  • one year ago

Ok. I have a very hard question. Hopefully someone here can solve it. Now for binary operations, well I have one here, and I need to know if there exists in R (the set of real numbers), an identity element for the operation *. Here is the operation, x*y=abs(x-y). Now when I do it, I break up the absolute value into x-e for x-e greater than 0 and -(x-e) for x-e less than 0, where e is the identity element. Please explain your steps to this problem.

  • This Question is Closed
  1. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    x * y = |x - y| x * e = |x - e| x = |x - e| ------------------------------------------------------- If x - e > 0, then x = x - e x-x = -e 0x = -e 0 = -e -e = 0 e = 0 ------------------------------------------------------- If x - e < 0, then x = -(x - e) -x = x - e -x-x = -e -2x = -e -e = -2x e = 2x So the identity element is either e = 0 or e = 2x for any real x.

  2. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I guess I should say though that if you're going for one unique identity element, then it would simply be 0

  3. corey1234
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yes, but the definition of an identity element for R is that x*e==e*x==x for ALL of R. The e=0 is only true for x greater than 0 and the e=2x is only true for x greater than 0 too. That is the confusing part.

  4. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    2x is only an identity for x, so 2x doesn't work for all x 0 works for all x so 0 is an identity of x*y

  5. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    i should clarify, e = 2x only satisfies x * e = 0 for any x since it doesn't work for e * x = 0, it starts to fall apart

  6. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    if you repeat the steps above, but do it for e * x instead of x * e, you'll find that e = 2x when e - x > 0 so e = 0 when x - e > 0 and e = 2x when e - x > 0 this means 2x = 0 ----> x = 0

  7. corey1234
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I am not so sure what you are talking about. You are not trying to solve for x. You are trying to solve for e. Now for x>e then e==0 and for x<e, e==2x. But when e==2x, then that means x<2x which means x>0. aND X*0==X AND X* 2X ==-X. So e=2x is automatically out of the question. But for e=0, x*0 only equals x when x>0.

  8. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yes, but we found that e = 2x and I showed that x = 0 so naturally e = 2x ---> e = 2*0 ----> e = 0

  9. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    x * 0 = x for all x (when x > 0 or x < 0)

  10. corey1234
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Ok I am kind of confused now. Can we start this from the beginning. So we are looking to see if there is an identity element for x*y==|x-y|. We check |x-e|, which equals x-e when x>e and -(x-e) when x<e. If x>e, then x-e==x and e==0. So that means if x>0, then x*0==x and 0*x==-x. This is a problem. e=0 only works as an identity element when x*0 not 0*x. Now we check for x< e. Then we agree that e==2x. So x*2x== -x for x>0 and x for x<0. So again, it is only x for when x is less than 0. So this is not an identity element either.

  11. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    when you say "e=0 only works as an identity element when x*0 not 0*x. " that's just not true IF x * y = x - y, then it would be true BUT the binary operation is x * y = |x - y| so x * 0 = |x - 0| x * 0 = |x| x * 0 = x and 0 * x = |0 - x| 0 * x = |-x| 0 * x = x So 0 is clearly an identity element for x * y = |x - y|

  12. corey1234
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Ok so what you are saying is that e*x== e-x when x<e and x-e when x>e and since e==0 and x>0 , then 0*x== x-0 which is just x?

  13. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yes, sry i was trying a different way to do this, but not really finding anything

  14. corey1234
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Also, when we first said that x>0, does that mean that that condition has to be true in order for x-0=x? Because x can be negative there?

  15. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yes you have to force x to be positive because this example below shows where things break down 0 * x = |0 - x| say x = -2 0 * (-2) = |0 - (-2)| 0 * (-2) = |0 + 2| -2 = 2

  16. corey1234
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes but then x*e==(x-e)=x works when x is negative if e==0. For example x-0=x, x can be negative there.

  17. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    you have to go back to the definition of what the binary operator is everytime it works for x - 0 = x but it doesn't work for |x - 0| = x

  18. corey1234
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    But why do you have to go back to the definition everytime. I mean, you used the fact that |x-e|==(x-e)=x to solve for e. And you found out that e=0. So shouldn't that condition hold for x-0=x? But it doesn't since x can be negative there.

  19. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    you want to find an identity element (e) for x * y = |x - y| not for x * y = x - y

  20. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    we break down |x-y| into its smaller parts to find the various possible solutions, then we piece them back together to find that only e = 0 is the identity element

  21. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    then we check to see if e = 0 is actually the true identity element for x * y = |x - y|

  22. corey1234
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    So what you are saying is that x>0 is only a condition for |x-e| to equal (x-e), and the fact that x-e=x is something totally different to just find e, which equals 0?

  23. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yes x > 0 means |x - 0| = x - 0, but we want something that will apply to both x > 0 and x < 0

  24. corey1234
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    But all of this works only when x>0. Which means e=0 is not an identity element because it is not true for all x in R.

  25. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    good point, if you restrict the domain to the set of positive numbers, then it works if the domain is the set of all real numbers, then it won't work because of the negative numbers

  26. corey1234
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    So then there is no identity element for the set of real numbers for this operation.?

  27. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yes it looks like it since it doesn't apply to all real numbers

  28. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    personally, I would restrict the domain and say e = 0 is the identity element, but it looks like there isn't one here

  29. corey1234
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    It just doesn't make sense to me how x>0 for |x-e|=x-e but x can be nagative for x-e=x. Then there is a contradiction right?

  30. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yeah in one sense, we're saying e = 0 is an identity element (which is supposed to be unique), but in another, we're saying e = 2x which says that we have infinitely many identity elements

  31. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    one quick way to determine there is no identity is this x * e = |x - e| x = |x - e| which only has solutions when x > 0 like you said (since k = |x| only has solutions when k > 0) but x is allowed to be negative, which contradicts this fact so there are no identity elements

  32. corey1234
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    But what about x-e==x. That can have negative x values. And x>0. Is that what you are saying?

  33. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yes x - e = x can have negative values, but we're referring to |x-y| not x-y

  34. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    this is why it's very important to check the possible solutions

  35. corey1234
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Ok thank you so much.

  36. jim_thompson5910
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    np

  37. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    Search OpenStudy
    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Ask a Question
Find more explanations on OpenStudy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.